State v. Hill
| Docket Number | A09-1947 |
| Decision Date | 24 August 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
162 cases
-
McGinn v. State
...Akins,298 Kan. 592, 315 P.3d 868, 882 (2014)(“The State bears the burden of proving the misconduct was harmless error.”); State v. Hill,801 N.W.2d 646, 654 (Minn.2011)(“[T]he State bears the burden of persuasion on claims of prosecutorial misconduct to demonstrate that ‘the misconduct did n......
-
State v. Little
...trial, an appellate court generally applies the more deferential plain-error standard in reviewing a claim of error. See State v. Hill, 801 N.W.2d 646, 654 (Minn.2011); Minn. R.Crim. P. 31.02 (“Plain error affecting a substantial right can be considered by the court ... on appeal even if it......
-
State v. Zornes, A12–0463.
...credibility” because it allows the fact-finder to see the whole person and his “general lack of respect for the law.” State v. Hill, 801 N.W.2d 646, 651–52 (Minn.2011). But crimes that have some bearing on dishonesty have more impeachment value than other crimes. See State v. Bettin, 295 N.......
-
State v. Bustos, A13–0961.
...we had determined that Bustos had objected and we analyzed his claim under the less stringent harmless-error standard.See State v. Hill, 801 N.W.2d 646, 658 (Minn.2011) (referring to the harmless-error standard as the “less onerous standard” as compared to the plain-error standard).2 Moreov......
Request a trial to view additional results