State v. Hill

• Decision Date: 10 January 2018
• Docket Number: DOCKET NO. A-0194-15T1
• Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER HILL, Defendant-Appellant.
• Court: New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
CHRISTOPHER HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

DOCKET NO. A-0194-15T1

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted December 19, 2017
January 10, 2018

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Before Judges Leone and Mawla.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County, Indictment No. 85-03-0176.

Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (David A. Gies, Designated Counsel, on the brief).

Joseph D. Coronato, Ocean County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Samuel Marzarella, Supervising Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel; William Kyle Meighan, Senior Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

Page 2

Defendant Christopher Hill appeals from a July 28, 2015 order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm.

In 1985, defendant was tried and convicted by a jury of first-degree murder. We affirmed his conviction on appeal. State v. Hill, No. A-2925-85 (App. Div. May 2, 1988) (slip. op. at 2).

The following facts are taken from the record. On November 2, 1984, the lifeless body of Arlene Carty was found by Stafford Township Police Sergeant Gregory McNally on Hay Road. Sergeant McNally had been dispatched to the scene because the victim's pocketbook had been found on Hay Road. He located the victim's body near the road, laying beneath cardboard boxes. She had been severely beaten with a two-by-four piece of lumber that was later found floating in a pond approximately three-tenths of a mile from the body.

Detective Jeffrey Thompson arrived at the scene and testified at trial that he discovered a button in one of the footprints near the victim. A splinter of wood was found in the victim's neck that matched the piece of lumber.

Dr. Ramesh Mahapatro, a board certified pathologist, performed an autopsy on the victim, and was also called as a witness for the State. He testified the autopsy revealed the cause of death to be asphyxia caused by a combination of blood in

Page 3

the lungs, the obstruction of the epiglottis by the fractured denture, and the compression of the hyoid bone.

Sergeant William Sheehan executed a search warrant at defendant's home. The shirt, the pants, the two-by-four piece of lumber, and a wood splinter were sent to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Lab. FBI Special Agent Robert Webb analyzed the shirt recovered from defendant's home and the button recovered at the scene.

Special Agent Webb testified a button was missing from the right cuff of the shirt, and that there was a torn area where the button should be located. He tested the button from the scene and another button on the shirt and testified:

It's my opinion that the button [found at the scene], which I'm holding before you, matches in its physical characteristics, its color, its texture and its chemical composition to the button I removed as a control sample from [the shirt found in defendant's home]. Therefore, the [button found at the scene] either originated from this shirt or from some other source which has buttons on it, and the buttons on this other source would have to have precisely the same physical characteristics, color, texture and chemical composition as the buttons on [the shirt].

Special Agent Edward L. Burwitz, a laboratory examiner for the FBI, also testified. He matched hairs from the victim's head with hair found on the defendant's pants. Special Agent Burwitz

Page 4

also analyzed and compared the yarns and threads from defendant's shirt to those found on the button at the scene.

In addition to the evidence gathered by police, defendant also confessed to the murder. The jury learned that after being read his Miranda¹ rights, defendant admitted he met the victim at a bar in Tuckerton on November 1, 1984, and that he had been drinking. Defendant admitted the victim left the bar alone. Shortly after she departed, defendant left the bar with a co-worker in defendant's truck. As defendant was driving along a highway, he observed the victim hitchhiking, and picked her up at his co-worker's request. Defendant then dropped off his co-worker and drove towards the victim's home.

Defendant admitted having an argument with the victim because she rebuffed his sexual advances. He stated the victim spilled beer on defendant and cursed at him. He then drove down Hay Road, pulled off to the side, and struck her in the face. After...