State v. Hines

CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
CitationState v. Hines, 882 A.2d 678, 275 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2005)
Decision Date12 September 2005
PartiesSTATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANNY HINES

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 440 (AC 24382), is denied.

Deborah G. Stevenson, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Melissa Streeto Brechlin, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • State v. White
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 20, 2022
    ...whether one is labeled an accessory or a principal." State v. Hines , 89 Conn. App. 440, 447, 873 A.2d 1042, cert. denied, 275 Conn. 904, 882 A.2d 678 (2005). Thus, "to establish a person's culpability as an accessory to a particular offense, the state must prove that the accessory, like th......
  • State v. Artis
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • July 10, 2012
    ...intended to cause Otero serious physical injury. See State v. Hines, 89 Conn. App. 440, 449-50, 873 A.2d 1042, cert. denied, 275 Conn. 904, 882 A.2d 678 (2005); State v. Holmes, supra, 75 Conn. App. 742 (intent inferred from conduct and cumulative effect of circumstantial evidence). The def......
  • Myers v. Commissioner of Correction
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2006
    ...v. Williams, 220 Conn. 385, 390, 599 A.2d 1053 (1991); State v. Hines, 89 Conn.App. 440, 454, 873 A.2d 1042, cert. denied, 275 Conn. 904, 882 A.2d 678 (2005). We carefully have reviewed the record, the court's ruling and the respective briefs submitted by the parties. The petitioner has not......
  • Myers v. Commissioner of Correction, (AC 26672) (Conn. App. 12/19/2006)
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2006
    ...v. Williams, 220 Conn. 385, 390, 599 A.2d 1053 (1991); State v. Hines, 89 Conn. App. 440, 454, 873 A.2d 1042, cert. denied, 275 Conn. 904, 882 A.2d 678 (2005). We carefully have reviewed the record, the court's ruling and the respective briefs submitted by the parties. The petitioner has no......