State v. Hogg
| Decision Date | 19 June 1934 |
| Docket Number | Motion No. 11387; No. 1677-6416. |
| Parties | STATE v. HOGG et al. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
This case is before us on motion for rehearing filed by defendants in error. In our original opinion we stated that the only question to be decided was "whether the statutes of this state in force at the time of the death of W. C. Hogg provided for a tax on these bequests," etc. This statement was somewhat inaccurate. We find on re-examination of the record that defendants in error did contend therein that our inheritance tax statutes are unconstitutional and void for several reasons. Only one of such reasons is considered of sufficient importance to require a discussion.
Defendants in error contend that, because our inheritance tax laws are so framed as to make a difference in the per cent. of tax to be paid by different classes of persons and parties, they are violative of section 1 of article 8 of our Constitution, requiring taxation to be equal and uniform. This contention seems to be based on the theory that the levy is in the nature of an ad valorem tax, levied on the property passing.
Before directly discussing the law question presented, we desire to call attention to the fact that the rule is that every possible presumption is in favor of the constitutionality of a statute, and such presumption obtains until the contrary is shown beyond a reasonable doubt. If a statute is susceptible of two constructions, one of which renders it constitutional and the other unconstitutional, it is our duty to give it the construction that sustains its constitutionality. Koy v. Schneider, 110 Tex. 407, 218 S. W. 479, 221 S. W. 880. We must construe our inheritance tax statutes by the above rule.
We quoted the statutes here involved in our original opinion. We will not repeat them here. It is sufficient to say that they comprise articles 7117 to 7122, both inclusive, of our civil statutes (as amended [Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. arts. 7117-7122]).
Article 7117, so far as applicable to this discussion, provides: "All property within the jurisdiction of this State, real or personal, corporate or incorporate, and any interest therein, * * * which shall pass absolutely or in trust by will or by the laws of descent or distribution of this * * * State * * * shall upon passing to or for the use of any person, corporation or association, be subject to a tax for the benefit of the State's general revenue fund in accordance with the following classifications," etc.
The succeeding articles which define the tax to be collected in the several classifications provide: "If passing to or for the use of, * * * the tax shall be:" [Then follows provisions levying the tax, not on the value or amount of the estate, but on the value or amount of the property passing to a particular class of parties.] Also the exemptions and amount of the tax vary according to the several classifications.
An examination of the authorities convinces us...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.
...sustain it unless its invalidity be apparent beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Hogg, 123 Tex. 568, 70 S.W.2d 699; on rehearing 123 Tex. 578, 72 S.W.2d 593: "* * * the rule is that every possible presumption is in favor of the constitutionality of a statute, and such presumption obtains u......
-
Steinger v. Smith
......Ins. Co., 72 S.W.2d 593; Jeck. v. O'Meara, 122 S.W.2d 897, 343 Mo. 559; Shannon. v. Crabtree, 71 S.W.2d 709; Smithpeter v. Mid-State. Motor Co., 74 S.W.2d 47; Stoltzfus v. Howey, 54. S.W.2d 501; Buzby v. Cary, 30 S.W.2d 171; State. ex rel. Cary v. Trimble, 43 S.W.2d 1050; ......
-
Singleton v. Pennington
...a construction. United States v. National Diary Products Corp., 372 U.S. 29, 32, 83 S.Ct. 594, 9 L.Ed.2d 561 (1963); State v. Hogg,123 Tex. 568, 72 S.W.2d 593 (1934). Consequently, we construe section 17.46 as excluding from the penalties of the Act any "false, misleading, or deceptive" sta......
-
Community Public Service Co. v. James
...are assessed upon a valuation basis, are practically universally held to be excise taxes. State v. Hogg, 123 Tex. 568, 70 S.W.2d 699, 72 S.W.2d 593. Use taxes are also generally so classified, as for example our automobile license tax. For all practical purposes an automobile would be of no......