State v. Indrisano

• Decision Date: 30 October 1992
• Citation: State v. Indrisano, 617 A.2d 168, 224 Conn. 914 (Conn. 1992)
• Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
• Parties: STATE of Connecticut v. Albert INDRISANO.

Page 168

617 A.2d 168

224 Conn. 914

STATE of Connecticut v. Albert INDRISANO.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided Oct. 30, 1992.

Sally S. King, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Rita M. Shair, Wallingford, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn.App. 283, 613 A.2d 1375, is granted, limited to the following questions:

"1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the record was insufficient, pursuant to State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), to permit adequate appellate review of the defendant's claims that, on its face and as applied, General Statutes § 53a-182 was void for vagueness under the state and federal constitutions?

"2. Is General Statutes § 53a-182 void for vagueness on its face and as applied to this case, under the state and federal constitutions?"

...