State v. Jackson

Docket NumberSC93108
Decision Date24 June 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
109 cases
  • State v. Pierce
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 24, 2014
    ...Erred in Not Giving Pierce's Requested Instruction on the “Nested” Lesser Offense of Possession In the companion case, State v. Jackson, 433 S.W.3d 390, 2014 WL 2861550 (Mo. banc 2014) (No. SC93108), the Court holds: The question presented in this case is whether the trial court can refuse ......
  • United States v. Naylor
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • April 5, 2018
    ...presence," the Washington court then entered conviction under the second-degree burglary statute. Id. at 210–11 ; see also State v. Jackson, 433 S.W.3d 390, 404 (Mo. banc 2014) (discussing "nested" lesser included offenses). The Missouri Court of Appeals could only do so if "building or inh......
  • State v. Blurton
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 15, 2016
    ...met the statutory requirements for giving the instruction. In support of this claim, Mr. Blurton cites this Court's recent decision in State v. Jackson, which held that the trial court is obligated to give a "nested" lesser included offense instruction when "a party timely requests the inst......
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 16, 2019
    ...under Missouri Law, a finder of facts has the ability to believe or disbelieve evidence. Jackson v. State [State v. Jackson] , 433 S.W.3d 390 (Mo 2014). Yet this is a case where regardless of what witness one believes, state or defense, which records one credits, state or defense, the same ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Section 5.4 Credibility of Witnesses in General
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Evidence Deskbook Chapter 5 Weight and Sufficiency
    • Invalid date
    ...S.W.3d 157, 167 (Mo. banc 2011)). Jurors are free to disbelieve a witness’s testimony. Cox, 473 S.W.3d at 126 (citing State v. Jackson, 433 S.W.3d 390, 403 (Mo. banc 2014)). A “jury is free to credit or discredit testimony as it believes appropriate.” Curtis v. Elecs. & Space Corp., 113 F.3......
  • Section 5.14 Uncontroverted Evidence
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Evidence Deskbook Chapter 5 Weight and Sufficiency
    • Invalid date
    ...any element until the [fact-finder] says it does.’” Perren v. Perren, 475 S.W.3d 741, 744 (Mo. App. S.D. 2015) (quoting State v. Jackson, 433 S.W.3d 390, 392 (Mo. banc 2014)). The trial court may disbelieve even uncontradicted testimony, and the appellate court defers to the trial court’s j......
  • Preservation of Instructional Error
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Objections Guidebook Part 2 MAKING A PROPER RECORD IN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CASES
    • Invalid date
    ...law of lesser-included offenses and made it much easier for the defense to get lesser-included offense instructions. · State v. Jackson, 433 S.W.3d 390 (Mo. banc 2014): Even though the trial court believed that there was no reasonable basis in the evidence to acquit of first degree robbery ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT