State v. James
Decision Date | 15 July 2022 |
Docket Number | CAAP-22-0000359 |
Parties | STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DYLAN RIVER JAMES, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Hawaii Court of Appeals |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 5CPC-20-0000051)
Upon consideration of the July 5, 2022 "Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dismissing Appeal for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction, Filed on June 23, 2022" (Motion to Reconsider), by Defendant-Appellant Dylan River James (James), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that on June 23, 2022, we entered an Order Dismissing Appeal for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction (Dismissal Order), dismissing this interlocutory appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
James asks us to reconsider the Dismissal Order and, under Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 2,[1]suspend the time requirement in HRAP Rule 4(b)(1) to allow the appeal to proceed. However, James has not presented any point of law or fact that we have overlooked or misapprehended in entering the Dismissal Order. See HRAP Rule 40(b).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider is denied.
---------
[1] HRAP Rule 2 provides:
In the interest of expediting a decision, or for other good cause shown, either Hawai'i appellate court, may suspend the requirements or provisions of any of these rules in a particular case on application of a party or on its own motion and may order proceedings in accordance with its direction.
We further note that HRAP Rule 26(b) provides that "no court or judge or justice is authorized to change the jurisdictional requirements contained in Rule 4 of these rules."
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial