State v. Johnson
| Docket Number | 20140794 |
| Decision Date | 14 November 2017 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
274 cases
-
Osguthorpe v. Rudd (In re Osguthorpe)
... ... His second wife of nearly two decades, June Osguthorpe (June), also outlived him. ¶8 Dr. Osguthorpe was a veterinarian, educated at Colorado State University (CSU). Dr. Osguthorpe and his first wife, Afton, acquired significant assets, including hundreds of acres of land throughout Utah. The ... at 240 (Johnson, J., concurring). Further, we "do not dispute that probate law will be applicable and provide an adequate remedy in many situations. Nevertheless, ... ...
-
Kelly v. Timber Lakes Prop. Owners Ass'n
... ... the issues most advantageous to themselves, while allowing an impartial tribunal to determine the merits of those arguments." 507 P.3d 368 State v. Johnson , 2017 UT 76, ¶ 8, 416 P.3d 443. See Robert J. Labrum, History and Application of the Plain Error Doctrine in Utah , 2000 Utah L ... ...
-
State v. Aziakanou
... ... Colwell , 2000 UT 8, ¶ 18, 994 P.2d 177. But the opponent of a peremptory strike need not prove purposeful discrimination at this point. This initial burden is satisfied by producing "evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred." Johnson v. California , 545 U.S. 162, 170, 125 S.Ct. 2410, 162 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005). ¶32 After the State used a peremptory strike to remove Juror 13, Aziakanou raised a Batson challenge. To make a prima facie showing of discrimination, defense counsel asserted that, "[I]t seem[ed] ... [Juror 13] was ... ...
-
State v. Ray
... ... Additionally, the constitutionality of a law may not be called into doubt simply on the basis that it "call[s] for the application of a qualitative standard." Johnson v. United States , 576 U.S. 591, 603–04, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). But "the failure of persistent efforts to establish a standard can provide evidence of vagueness." Id. at 598, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (quotation simplified). In the case before us, based on the plain language of the ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
SUPPLEMENTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING.
...relief and constitutional right manifest error). (50.) For an overview of the term, see supra note 3. (51.) See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 416 P.3d 443, 457-58 (Utah 2017) (detailing when such sua sponte action is merited); Kaiserman Assocs. v. Francis Town, 977 P.2d 462, 464 (Utah 1998) (pro......