State v. Johnson
Docket Number | 20140794 |
Decision Date | 03 October 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
41 cases
-
Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. v. Weston
..., and "new arguments , when brought under a properly preserved issue or theory, do not require an exception to preservation." State v. Johnson , 2017 UT 76, ¶ 14 n.2, 416 P.3d 443 (emphasis in original). This includes "citing new authority or cases supporting an issue that was properly pres......
-
State v. Granere
...for appeal when it has been presented to the district court in such a way that the court has an opportunity to rule on it." State v. Johnson, 2017 UT 76, ¶ 15, 416 P.3d 443 (quotation simplified). "To provide the court with this opportunity, the issue must be specifically raised by the part......
-
Wittingham v. TNE Ltd. P'ship
...claims or legal theories) and new ‘arguments’ in support. of preserved issues (such as the citation of new legal authority)"); State v. Johnson, 2017 UT 76, ¶ 14 n.2, 416 P.3d 443 (stating that this court has "rejected the distinction between ‘issues’ and ‘arguments’ when determining whethe......
-
State v. Centeno
...the confrontation and prejudice theories he now presents on appeal. But for purposes of preservation, "we view issues narrowly," State v. Johnson , 2017 UT 76, ¶ 14 n.2, 416 P.3d 443 (cleaned up), and require a party to raise an issue before the district court with specificity, id. ¶ 15. Mo......
Get Started for Free