State v. Johnson

Decision Date01 November 1949
Citation69 A.2d 515,96 N.H. 4
PartiesSTATE v. JOHNSON.
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Raymond K. Perkins, County Solicitor, Concord, for the State, filed no brief.

Willoughby A. Colby, Concord (by brief and orally), for the defendant.

KENISON, Justice.

The single question presented is whether one who pleads not guilty by reason of mental derangement to a felony may be committed to the state prison. The pertinent statute, R.L. c. 429, § 3 provides: 'In either of the cases aforesaid the court, if it is of opinion that it will be dangerous that such person should go at large, may commit him to the prison or to the state hospital, there to remain until he is discharged by due course of law.' It is undisputed that aggravated assault is a felony and upon conviction the respondent may be sentenced to state prison. R.L. c. 455, § 23; Newell v. Moreau, 94 N.H. 439, 441, 55 A.2d 476. Nor is there any doubt that this defendant could be committed to the state hospital. Defendant maintains, however, that the phrase 'the prison' in the quoted statute refers only to a county jail or house of correction and not to the state prison and has submitted a comprehensive brief analyzing the prior legislation on crime and insanity in support of that contention. Stated otherwise defendant contends that there can be no commitment to state prison unless the statute specifically names the state prison.

Title 37 of the Revised Laws defining the majority of crimes and offenses in the state uses the verb 'imprisoned' throughout as applicable to felonies punishable by sentences to state prison as well as misdemeanors punishable by sentences to jail or house of correction. See R.L. c. 440, § 21; R.L. c. 455, § 16. Title 38 of the Revised Laws, Imprisonment, uses the term 'prisoners' throughout as applicable to common or county jails, R.L. c. 461, houses of correction, R.L. c. 462, § 4, and the state prison, R.L. c. 464. This indicates the generic nature of the word 'prison' and allied terms as used in our statutes even though there is a well defined distinction between the state prison on the one hand and county jails and houses of correction on the other hand. See Martin v. Martin, 47 N.H. 52, 53.

Now, as formerly, the legislation relating to confinement and imprisonment is not as perfect as it might be, State ex rel. Barnes v. Shattuck, 45 N.H. 205, but, when construed in accordance with popular understanding, it has not proved to be a deterrent to its effective administration. Cf. Petition of Morin, 95 N.H. ----, 68 A.2d 668. If the word 'prison' in R.L. c. 429, § 3 is construed as including the state prison but not limited to that institution, there is consistency in all the statutes. Such an interpretation is followed elsewhere, Sturtevant v. Commonwealth, 158 Mass. 598, 33 N.E. 648, and a contrary one would do violence to the habitual criminal act, R.L. c. 460, § 1, where the word is also used in a general sense as...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Moulton, In re
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1950
    ...their cure.' Merrimack County v. Concord, 39 N.H. 213, 216. Such commitment is not regarded as a sentence or punishment. State v. Johnson, 96 N.H. 4, 6, 69 A.2d 515; In re Kemmerer, 309 Mich. 313, 15 N.W.2d 652. The act now under attack provides for care, treatment, segregation and rehabili......
  • Grooms v. Fervida, PS
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • November 5, 1979
    ...legal character than those for which a person is incarcerated in the county jail. Martin v. Martin (1866), 47 N.H. 52; State v. Johnson (1949), 96 N.H. 4, 69 A.2d 515; Denham v. Commonwealth (1905), 119 Ky. 508, 84 S.W. 538. Until the Legislature abolished the distinctions for sentencing pu......
  • Cornwall Industries, Inc. v. Maine Dept. of Manpower Affairs, Employment Sec. Commission
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • January 30, 1976
  • Toussaint v. State
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • February 19, 1970
    ...be sentenced, and was not limited to the state prison. Sturtevant v. Commonwealth, 1893, 158 Mass. 598, 33 N.E. 648; State v. Johnson, 1949, 96 N.H. 4, 69 A.2d 515, 516; State v. Rardon, 1943, 221 Ind. 154, 46 N.E.2d 605, The entry will be Appeal denied. DUFRESNE, J., did not sit. 1 ' § 393......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT