State v. Jose A.B.

Docket NumberSC20332
Decision Date22 March 2022

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • State v. Patel
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • March 22, 2022
  • Inglis v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • June 28, 2022
    ... ... Garg, assigned counsel, for the appellant (petitioner). Nancy L. Chupak, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Michael A. Gailor, state's attorney, Tamara A. Grosso, former senior assistant state's attorney, and ... Jose A. B. , 342 Conn. 489, 507–508, 270 A.3d 656 (2022). 17 Even if we assume, arguendo, that the petitioner could show cause and prejudice to ... ...
  • State v. Juan J.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • July 5, 2022
    ... ... 21 defendant engage[d] in sexual intercourse with another person, (2) such other person is under thirteen years 276 A.3d 948 of age, and (3) the [defendant] is more than two years older than such person ... " (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jose A. B. , 342 Conn. 489, 534, 270 A.3d 656 (2022), quoting General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2) ; see also State v. Pierson , 201 Conn. 211, 215, 514 A.2d 724 (1986) ("[w]e have held that sexual assault in the first degree is a general intent crime with no element of specific intent"). The crime ... ...
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • June 3, 2024
    ... 549 P.3d 985 2024 CO 35 The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner, v. Raeaje Resshaud JOHNSON, Respondent. Supreme Court Case No. 22SC852 Supreme Court of Colorado. June 3, 2024 549 P.3d 987 ... Rudas, 905 F.2d 38, 41 (2d Cir. 1990) (same); State v. Jose A. B., 342 Conn. 489, 270 A.3d 656, 678–80 (2022) (noting that with the exception of two cases—one from New Jersey and one from ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • 2022 Connecticut Appelate Review
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 95, 2025
    • January 1, 2025
    ...Notes: [1] 342 Conn. 445, 270 A.3d 627, cert, denied, 143 S.Ct. 216 (2022). [2] Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). [3] 342 Conn. 489, 270 A.3d 656 (2022). [4] Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991). [5] Text, history, federal precedents. Connecticut precedents, out-of-state pre......