State v. Kalil

• Decision Date: 17 September 2012
• Citation: 307 Conn. 902,53 A.3d 217
• Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
• Parties: STATE of Connecticut v. Albert KALIL.

307 Conn. 902

53 A.3d 217

STATE of Connecticut

v.Albert KALIL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided Sept. 17, 2012.

Daniel J. Krisch, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

*218Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 136 Conn.App. 454, 46 A.3d 272, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's decision admitting the testimony of a Rhode Island police officer on grounds that the evidence was admissible for proof of intent and to ‘complete the story of the charged crime’ and that the prejudicial effect did not outweigh the probative value?”