State v. Kelsey
| Decision Date | 03 April 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 1--374A35,1--374A35 |
| Citation | 163 Ind.App. 543,325 N.E.2d 218 |
| Parties | STATE of Indiana, Defendant-Appellant, v. Steve R. KELSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee. |
| Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, G. Philip Duckwall, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for defendant-appellant.
Robert L. Mellen, Jr., Bedford, William L. Thompson, Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.
The State appeals from a directed verdict acquitting defendant-appellee, Kelsey, of charges of reckless homicide and involuntary manslaughter.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing the verdict.
Finding that the directed verdict was improperly granted, we sustain the appeal.
The criminal charges against Kelsey stem from an auto-truck collision which occurred on State Road 60, two miles south of Salem, Indiana. Kelsey was driving a semi tractor-trailer toward Salem at a speed of less than fifty miles per hour. Five or six cars were immediately ahead of Kelsey and one or two were behind. The driver of one of the cars following Kelsey stated that the truck had been weaving back and forth within its own lane for three or four miles as if Kelsey were trying to find a place to pull off or turn. Suddenly the truck swerved across the center line at a 45 degree angle into the oncoming traffic. A station wagon swerved and narrowly missed a collision, but a pickup truck was unable to avoid Kelsey and was struck in the rear. Almost immediately, Kelsey's truck collided head on with another auto whose driver died of injuries sustained in the crash.
The cause of the accident was subject to dispute. The driver of the pickup truck testified that it appeared Kelsey crossed the center line in an effort to pass, although the accident occurred in a no-passing zone. However, another witness stated that it appeared as if Kelsey had fallen asleep. As it appeared to this witness, Kelsey was not trying to pass 'because he didn't pull out and turn; he just went straight over there.'
At the conclusion of the State's evidence, Kelsey filed a motion for directed verdict which the trial court granted as to both charges. This appeal follows.
A directed verdict is properly granted only where there is a total absence of evidence on some essential element of the offense charged, or where the evidence is without conflict and is suspectible of but one inference in favor of the accused. State v. Overmyer (1973), Ind.App., 294 N.E.2d 172.
Reckless homicide is defined by IC 1971, 9--4--1--54(a) (Burns Code Ed. 1973):
'Any person who drives a vehicle with reckless disregard for the safety of others and thereby causes the death of another person shall be guilty of the offense of reckless homicide.'
Involuntary manslaughter is defined by IC 1971, 35--13--4--2, Ind.Ann.Stat. § 10--3405 (Burns Supp.1974):
'Whoever kills any human being without malice, expressed or implied, involuntarily but in the commission of some unlawful act, is guilty of involuntary manslaughter * * *.'
It has been held that the essential elements of both offenses are the same. Cichos v. Indiana (1966), 385 U.S. 76, 87 S.Ct. 271, 17 L.Ed.2d 175. If the evidence is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Graham v. State
...mediately or immediately to the death of another person. Powell v. State (1982), Ind., 437 N.E.2d 969, 971; State v. Kelsey (1975), 163 Ind.App. 543, 545, 325 N.E.2d 218, 219; Coffelt v. State (1974), 159 Ind.App. 485, 490, 307 N.E.2d 497, 500, quoting Votre v. State (1923), 192 Ind. 684, 6......
-
State v. Goodrich
...is not sufficient to establish reckless conduct. DeVaney v. State (1972), 259 Ind. 483, 288 N.E.2d 732, 738; State v. Kelsey (1975), 163 Ind.App. 543, 325 N.E.2d 218, 219. The State therefore failed to establish any evidence on the element of recklessness and the judgment on the evidence wa......
-
Drossos v. State
...of the victim. Carter v. State, (1968) 250 Ind. 50, 234 N.E.2d 850; Reed v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 387 N.E.2d 82; State v. Kelsey, (1975) 163 Ind.App. 543, 325 N.E.2d 218. Thus, it is a complete defense to such action that the deceased driver's own negligence was the proximate cause of the......
-
Reed v. State
...is the direct and proximate cause of the death of the victim. Carter v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 50, 234 N.E.2d 850; State v. Kelsey (1975), Ind.App., 325 N.E.2d 218. Such rule is equally applicable here. Both the statute, IC 9-4-1-54(b)1, Supra, and the charging indictment required proof tha......