State v. Kinder

Decision Date08 May 1899
Citation57 P. 94,22 Mont. 516
PartiesSTATE v. KINDER et al.
CourtMontana Supreme Court

Appeal from district court, Silverbow county; William Clancy, Judge.

J. W. Kinder, charged under the name of William Kinder, and Hannah Kinder were convicted of receiving stolen goods, and appeal. Reversed.

C. M. Parr, for appellants.

C. B. Nolan, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal by both defendants from judgment of conviction for receiving stolen property, knowing the same to have been stolen. Pen. Code, § 899. The attorney general frankly confesses that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction under the information filed herein. We shall not state the testimony, but have read it, and agree that it is altogether insufficient to convict J. W. Kinder of any crime at all; and, although it goes to show that Hannah Kinder stole certain property and was guilty of the crime of larceny, in no respect did it justify her conviction of having received stolen goods, knowing the same to have been stolen. The distinction between larceny and receiving stolen goods is commented upon in State v. Rechnitz, 20 Mont. 488, 52 P. 264. A defendant cannot be charged with one crime and convicted of the other. Judgment reversed. Reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT