State v. King
| Decision Date | 11 February 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 22569,22569 |
| Citation | 346 S.E.2d 323,289 S.C. 371 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | The STATE, Respondent, v. Merle W. KING, Appellant. . Heard |
Deputy Chief Atty. Elizabeth C. Fullwood, of South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for appellant.
Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Attys. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Carlisle Roberts, Jr., Columbia, and Sol. Charles M. Condon, Charleston, for respondent.
Appellant Merle W. King was indicted for felony driving under the influence [S.C. Code Ann. § 56-5-2945 (Supp.1985) ]. He was tried, convicted and sentenced. This appeal followed. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Appellant contends the trial judge erred in refusing to charge the jury the law of involuntary manslaughter [a common law crime] and reckless homicide [S.C. Code Ann. § 56-5-2910 (1976) ]. He argues these offenses are lesser included offenses of felony D.U.I. As a matter of policy, we agree. 1
It is clear that the same facts could easily justify an indictment on any of these offenses. The legislature did not intend that felony D.U.I. supplant the offenses of involuntary manslaughter and reckless homicide, but instead intended to supplement these offenses. See State v. Bodiford, 282 S.C. 378, 318 S.E.2d 567 (1984). These offenses give the Courts a broad spectrum of offenses to apply in appropriate cases.
Accordingly, we hold that involuntary manslaughter and reckless homicide are lesser included offenses of felony D.U.I. in a case where a death occurs. 2 Our disposition of this issue makes it unnecessary to consider appellant's remaining exceptions. The conviction and sentence are reversed, and the case is remanded for a new trial.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
1 Of course, the facts of an individual case may preclude charging these lesser included offenses. See State v. Gandy, 283 S.C. 571, 324 S.E.2d 65 (1984).
2 Felony D.U.I. contains alternate elements of death or serious injury. See Section 56-5-2945. Our holding does not extend to cases where a death does not occur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Kornahrens, 22618
...S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-40 (1985). The same set of facts may support an indictment for one of several distinct offenses. State v. King, 289 S.C. 371, 346 S.E.2d 323 (1986); State v. Bodiford, 282 S.C. 378, 318 S.E.2d 567 (1984). Appellant was indicted for capital murder, S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-2......
-
Watts v. Watts
... ... convince this court that the family court committed error ... Skinner v. King , 272 S.C. 520, 522-23, 252 S.E.2d ... 891, 892 (1979) ... LAW/ANALYSIS ... I ... Attorney's Fees ... ...
-
State v. Cribb
...3 and reckless homicide, 4 which require proof of recklessness, are lesser included offenses of felony DUI. State v. King, 289 S.C. 371, 346 S.E.2d 323 (1986). Cribb argues that implicit in King is a finding that recklessness is an element of felony DUI. Thus, according to Cribb, because in......
-
State v. Walsh
...as to legislative intent into a conclusive presumption of law. Id., 471 U.S. at 779, 105 S.Ct. at 2411. See also State v. King, 289 S.C. 371, 346 S.E.2d 323 (1986); State v. Suttles, 279 S.C. 87, 302 S.E.2d 338 (1983). Thus, when legislative intent is clear from the face of the statute or t......
-
C. Classification of Offenses
...under the influence. State v. Cribb, 310 S.C. 518, 426 S.E.2d 306 (1992). In reaching this conclusion the Court overruled State v. King, 289 S.C. 371, 346 S.E.2d 323 (1986), which had held that involuntary manslaughter and reckless homicide are lesser included offenses of felony DUI. Assaul......
-
A. Homicide
...of both involuntary manslaughter and reckless homicide. State v. Cribb, 310 S.C. 518, 426 S.E.2d 306 (1992) (overruling State v. King, 289 S.C. 371, 346 S.E.2d 323 (1986)). Convictions of reckless homicide and felony DUI (death) based on the same facts do not violate the protection against ......