State v. Kiss, 2794

Decision Date19 March 1985
Docket NumberNo. 2794,2794
Citation3 Conn.App. 400,488 A.2d 845
CourtConnecticut Court of Appeals
PartiesSTATE of Connecticut v. Kathleen E. KISS.

Richard R. Brown, Hartford, for appellant (defendant).

Susan C. Marks, Sp. Deputy Asst. State's Atty., with whom, on the brief, were Mark Solak and Carl Schuman, Asst. State's Attys., for appellee (state).

Before HULL, SPALLONE and DALY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant pleaded guilty to a felony, selling cocaine in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1981) § 19-480(a) (now § 21a-277[a], on the basis of plea negotiations. After polling the defendant, the trial court accepted the plea of guilty and, on November 8, 1983, imposed a sentence, in accordance with the plea bargain, of five years imprisonment, sentence suspended after two years, and three years of probation. On November 15, 1983, through new counsel, the defendant moved to withdraw the plea of guilty claiming various infirmities in the trial court's acceptance of that plea. The trial court was correct in denying that motion on the ground that it was untimely under Practice Book § 720 since it was not filed before the imposition of the sentence.

There is no error.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Garvin
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 1996
    ...review of claimed infirmities in the acceptance of a plea. State v. Martin, 197 Conn. 17, 21, 495 A.2d 1028 (1985); State v. Kiss, 3 Conn.App. 400, 488 A.2d 845 (1985)." State v. Schaeffer, supra, 5 Conn.App. at 385, 498 A.2d 134. In this case, the defendant failed to move to withdraw his p......
  • State v. Martin
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • July 23, 1985
    ...or nolo contendere 7 "after the conclusion of the proceeding at which the sentence was imposed." Practice Book § 720; State v. Kiss, 3 Conn.App. 400, 488 A.2d 845 (1985). This section, restricting the authority of a court to permit withdrawal of a plea, is applicable to the defendant's May ......
  • State v. Schaeffer, 2243
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 24, 1985
    ...review of claimed infirmities in the acceptance of a plea. State v. Martin, 197 Conn. 17, 21, 495 A.2d 1028 (1985); State v. Kiss, 3 Conn.App. 400, 488 A.2d 845 (1985). Postsentence attacks on the voluntary and intelligent nature of a plea, however, may be made if the defendant has not been......
  • Ducci Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Department of Transp.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • July 7, 1992
    ... ... Atty. Gen., with whom, on the brief, was Richard Blumenthal, Atty. Gen., for appellee (state) ...         Before [28 Conn.App. 175] DALY, FREDERICK A. FREEDMAN and CRETELLA, JJ ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT