State v. Kline, 75-142-CR
Decision Date | 30 June 1976 |
Docket Number | No. 75-142-CR,75-142-CR |
Parties | STATE of Wisconsin, Respondent, v. Albert J. KLINE, Appellant. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Ozaukee County; Charles L. Larson, Judge.
James A. Hanley, Milwaukee, for appellant.
Marguerite M. Moeller, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, Atty. Gen., for respondent.
The court is equally divided on the question of whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Beilfuss, Mr. Justice Heffernan, and Mr. Justice Day being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice Hanley, Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. The judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond
...Wilkie's death resulted in a tie after his death: Punches v. Schmidt, 73 Wis.2d 206, 243 N.W.2d 518 (1976) ; and State v. Kline, 73 Wis.2d 337, 243 N.W.2d 519 (1976). In each case, the court issued a per curiam opinion on June 30, 1976, stating how each justice had voted and further stating......
-
Smith v. Kleynerman
...Wis.2d 145, 163 N.W.2d 8 (1968) (on appeal).52. State v. White , 59 Wis.2d 354, 208 N.W.2d 321 (1973) (on appeal).53. State v. Kline , 73 Wis.2d 337, 243 N.W.2d 519 (1976) (on appeal).54. Brown v. State , 73 Wis.2d 351, 243 N.W.2d 519 (1976) (on appeal).55. Punches v. S chmid t , 73 Wis.2d ......
-
St. Croix Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. Michael D. (In re Termination of Parental Rights to Matthew D.)
...in cases where the supreme court was equally divided. See Punches v. Schmidt, 73 Wis.2d 206, 243 N.W.2d 518 (1976) ; State v. Kline, 73 Wis.2d 337, 243 N.W.2d 519 (1976). Justice Abrahamson was appointed to fill the vacancy created by Chief Justice Wilkie's death, but she was not sworn in u......
- Brown v. State, 75-123-CR