State v. Knobel
| Citation | 309 Or. 522,789 P.2d 1387 |
| Parties | State v. Knobel (Paul Kenneth) NOS. A43491, S36776 |
| Decision Date | 27 March 1990 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Oregon |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
State v. Meyer
......Graves, 299 Or. 189, 195, 700 P.2d 244 (1985); State v. Knobel, 97 Or.App. 559, 563, 777 P.2d 985, rev. den. 309 Or. 522, 789 P.2d 1387 (1989). Terms need not be defined so precisely that, in every instance, a person can predict that a specific act or course of conduct will fall within the statute's prohibitions. State v. Graves, supra, 299 Or. at 195, 700 ......
-
State v. Valle
...688 P.2d 1311,State v. Muldrew, 229 Or.App. 219, 210 P.3d 936 (2009), and State v. Knobel, 97 Or.App. 559, 777 P.2d 985 (1989), rev. den.,309 Or. 522, 789 P.2d 1387 (1990). In Hubbard, the parties disputed whether the officer who had arrested the defendant had used excessive force. To impea......
-
State v. Naudain
......We conclude otherwise. Bias or interest can be shown through the witness’s relationship to another person when the bias is a matter of reasonable inference. In State v. Knobel , 97 Or. App. 559, 566, 777 P.2d 985 (1989), rev. den. , 309 Or. 522, 789 P.2d 1387 (1990), the defendant sought to cross-examine a state witness, a deputy sheriff, about his awareness of derogatory articles that the defendant had written about the sheriff and the sheriff’s dislike of the ......
-
State v. Crum
...of the police officer witness." Id. at 802, 688 P.2d 1311. See also State v. Knobel, 97 Or. App. 559, 567, 777 P.2d 985 (1989), rev. den., 309 Or. 522, 789 P.2d 1387 (1990) (trial court erred by excluding evidence that witness's employer was hostile toward defendant and the error was not ha......
Request a trial to view additional results