State v. Koch
| Decision Date | 11 May 1972 |
| Citation | 119 N.J.Super. 184,290 A.2d 738 |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harry KOCH, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, and Gerald Boswell, Asst. Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.
John S. Kuhlthau, Middlesex County Prosecutor, and Thomas Kapsak, Asst. Middlesex County Prosecutor, for respondent.
Before Judges CONFORD, MATTHEWS and FRITZ.
See our prior opinion herein. State v. Koch, 118 N.J.Super. 421, 288 A.2d 295 (App.Div.1972). After rendition thereof the United States Supreme Court held, on March 22, 1972, in Loper v. Beto, 405 U.S. 473, 92 S.Ct. 1014, 31 L.Ed.2d 374 (1972), that the use of uncounselled prior convictions to impeach credibility of a defendant in a criminal trial invalidated a conviction at such trial (absent harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt) and that its determination was as fully retroactive as was the decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). The substantive holding accords with our previous opinion; the determination on retroactivity goes beyond it. In any event, the decision confirms the correctness of our disposition of defendant's post-conviction application.
The remand directed by our earlier opinion has been executed. On sufficient testimony by defendant and representations by the Middlesex County Prosecutor concerning the uninformative state of the South Carolina records, the trial judge has found, as he was compelled to on the record before him, that defendant neither had nor waived legal representation on the occasions of either the 1949 conviction of highway robbery or the 1957 conviction of escape.
The instant conviction of armed robbery is set aside and reversed and the cause is remanded for prompt retrial.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Jenkins
...convictions are inadmissible. State v. Rios, 155 N.J.Super. 11, 15, 382 A.2d 82 (Law Div.197 ). See also State v. Koch, 119 N.J.Super. 184, 290 A.2d 738 (App.Div.1972). A probation violation is distinguished from a criminal conviction even though a custodial sentence may result from such a ......
-
People v. Moore
...216 N.W.2d 770 ... PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, ... Reuben MOORE a/k/a Reuben Baker, Defendant-Appellant ... 391 Mich. 426, 216 N.W.2d 770 ... Supreme Court of ... 636, 452 P.2d 924 (1969); Johnson v. State, 9 Md.App. 166, 263 A.2d 232 (1970); State v. Koch. 118 N.J.Super. 421, 288 A.2d 295 (1972); rule modified and extended in light of Loper, 119 N.J.Super. 184, 290 A.2d 738 (1972) ... Following Loper, ... ...
-
State v. Nash
...this case, just as it did in State v. Koch, 118 N.J.Super. 421, 288 A.2d 295 (App.Div.1972), final judgment entered in 119 N.J.Super. 184, 290 A.2d 738 (App.Div.1972). The court there was faced with the problem of retroactivity of Burgett v. Texas, 389 U.S. 109, 88 S.Ct. 258, 19 L.Ed.2d 319......
-
Turner v. Aldens, Inc.
...58 N.J. 410 (278 A.2d 200) (1971); State v. Koch, supra (118 N.J.Super. 421 (288 A.2d 295) (App.Div.1972), final judgment entered in 119 N.J.Super. 184 (290 2/5.2d 738) (App.Div.1972)). (at 470-471, 317 A.2d A weighing of these competing considerations and others of perhaps less significanc......