State v. Koedatich
| Decision Date | 15 February 1983 |
| Citation | 459 A.2d 641,93 N.J. 39 |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey v. James J. KOEDATICH. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Leave to appeal is granted, the February 9, 1983, order of the Superior Court, Law Division, is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court to permit the bail reduction hearing to proceed; and it is further ORDERED that the motion for clarification is dismissed as moot. Jurisdiction of the pending appeal is otherwise retained.
To continue reading
Request your trial
25 cases
- Daily Press, LLC v. Commonwealth
-
State v. Williams
... 93 N.J. 39 ... 459 A.2d 641, 9 Media L. Rep. 1585 ... STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, ... James E. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant ... STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, ... James J. KOEDATICH, Defendant-Appellant ... Supreme Court of New Jersey ... Argued Feb. 23, 1983 ... Decided April 26, 1983 ... [459 A.2d 644] ... M. Virginia Barta, Asst. Deputy Public Defender, for defendant-appellant James E. Williams (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney; ... ...
- State v. Hempele
-
State v. Marshall
... ... Biegenwald, 106 N.J. 13, 33, 524 A.2d 130 (1987) (citations omitted). It is the rare case indeed in which prejudice due to pretrial publicity will be presumed. State v. Koedatich, 112 N.J. 225, 269, 548 A.2d 939 (1988) (citation omitted). Defendant does not argue, nor is there evidence in the record to suggest, that the publicity in Atlantic County was so great as to justify a finding of presumed prejudice. See id. at 273, 548 A.2d 939. Accordingly, we will apply the ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
STATE REJECTION OF FEDERAL LAW.
...Slate v. Hunt, 450 A.2d 952, 965-67 (N.J. 1982) (Handler, J., concurring) (announcing seven factors to be considered); State v. Williams, 459 A.2d 641, 653-59 (N.J. 1983) (adopting the Hunt factors by a Robert F. Williams has identified several other states in addition to New Jersey--Washin......
-
The Common Law as a Guide to State Constitutional Interpretation.
...lockstep but doing so anyway). (138.) See Hale, supra note 137, at 941 (defining lockstep analysis). (139.) See, e.g., State v. Williams, 459 A.2d 641, 650 (N.J. 1983) (interpreting defendant's trial rights under U.S. Constitution first then under New Jersey Constitution); Whitworth v. Bynu......
-
The Common Law as a Guide to State Constitutional Interpretation.
...lockstep but doing so anyway). (138.) See Hale, supra note 137, at 941 (defining lockstep analysis). (139.) See, e.g., State v. Williams, 459 A.2d 641, 650 (N.J. 1983) (interpreting defendant's trial rights under U.S. Constitution first then under New Jersey Constitution); Whitworth v. Bynu......