State v. Kring
Decision Date | 30 April 1880 |
Citation | 71 Mo. 551 |
Parties | THE STATE v. KRING, Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.
G. S. Van Wagoner and P. N. Jones for appellant.J. L. Smith, Attorney-General, and J. C. Normile, Circuit Attorney, for the State.
I. The defendant, charged with murder in the first degree, entered, with the consent of the circuit attorney, a plea of guilty of murder in the second degree, and was thereupon sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of twenty-five years. Upon being sentenced he filed his motion to set aside the judgment and sentence and permit the withdrawal of the plea of guilty, and the original plea of not guilty to be entered, this motion was based upon the grounds of having entered such plea in consequence of an agreement entered into with the acting circuit attorney, apparently sanctioned by the judge of the criminal court, that the sentence should not exceed ten years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The affidavits supporting the motion are uncontradicted. The essential features of this case are precisely similar to those of State v. Stephens, 71 Mo. 535, and we adhere to the conclusion therein announced.
II. The defendant was entitled to his bill of exceptions, upon his motion to set aside the judgment being denied. Otherwise, a defendant, aggrieved solely by the erroneous judgment of a court and not by anything occurring during the progress of the trial would be remediless. For, in order to avail himself of any error committed in rendering judgment, he would have to, as in this instance, file his motion to set aside the judgment, and on such motion being denied, he would have to except to such denial, and preserve his exception by bill for that purpose. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The State v. Borchert
... ... and, if the court abused its discretion in overruling same, ... the record of said proceedings could be brought before this ... court by appeal on writ of error for our determination ... [State v. Stephens, 71 Mo. 535; State v ... Kring, 71 Mo. 551; State v. Dale, 222 S.W. l ... c. 764; State v. Meyer, 222 S.W. l. c. 765.] ... ...
-
State v. Kellar
... ... guilty where defendant's sole complaint is that, had he ... anticipated the severity of the consequent punishment, he ... would not have pleaded guilty." ... In ... State v. Stephens, 71 Mo. 535; State v ... Kring, 71 Mo. 551; State v. Dale, 282 Mo. 663, ... 222 S.W. 763, and State v. Meyer (Mo.), 222 S.W ... 765, it was held that the trial court had abused its ... discretion in refusing to permit withdrawal of a plea of ... guilty. But, as pointed out in State v. Rogers ... (Mo.), 285 S.W. 976, ... ...
-
State v. Hamilton
...268; State v. Keller, 55 S.W.2d 969; State v. Cochran, 60 S.W.2d 1; State v. Hare, 56 S.W.2d 141; State v. Stephens, 71 Mo. 535; State v. Kring, 71 Mo. 551. McKittrick, Attorney General, and William W. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. (1) The only matter before this court......
-
State v. Abel
...Pac. 783; State v. LaRose, 52 Atl. 943; Sanders v. State, 148 Ala. 603; Wilson v. State, 73 Ala. 527; State v. Kring, 74 Mo. 612; State v. Kring, 71 Mo. 551; Dean v. State, 161 S.W. 974; Commonwealth v. Lannin, 13 Allen (Mass.) 563; People v. Cignorak, 110 N.Y. 23; State v. Stephens, 71 Mo.......