State v. Langley
| Decision Date | 25 September 1957 |
| Citation | 214 Or. 445,315 P.2d 560 |
| Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William M. LANGLEY, Appellant. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; Frank J. Lonergan, Judge.
Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., and Peter S. Herman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the motion.
The State has moved for an order supplementing the transcript of testimony so as to include proceedings in connection with the selection of and initial admonitions to the jury, which are not included in the bill of exceptions filed here by the defendant-appellant. The defendant, by letter, has advised the court that he has no objection to the supplementation.
For the reasons stated in Kraft v. Montgomery Ward & Co. et al., Or., 315 P.2d 558, the motion is denied; but the bill of exceptions will be returned to the trial court for amendment in that court upon proper application.
Motion denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Welker By and Through Bradbury v. Teacher Standards and Practices Com'n
...from another jurisdiction, that indicates that "malfeasance" involves much more than mere negligence. See State v. Langley, 214 Or. 445, 464-66, 315 P.2d 560, 323 P.2d 301, cert. den. 358 U.S. 826, 79 S.Ct. 45, 3 L.Ed.2d 66 (1958) (defining malfeasance as "evil doing, the doing of an act wh......
-
State v. Clark
...See, e. g., State v. Jones, 279 Or. 55, 566 P.2d 867 (1977); In re Roger Rook, 276 Or. 695, 556 P.2d 1351 (1976); State v. Langley, 214 Or. 445, 315 P.2d 560, 323 P.2d 301 (1958). As stated in Dickinson v. Davis, 277 Or. 665, 673, 561 P.2d 1019 (1977), about penalties under the motor carrie......
-
State v. Shadley
...the opposite result. State v. Nussbaum, 261 Or. 87, 491 P.2d 1013 (1971); State v. Rood, 234 Or. 196, 380 P.2d 806 (1963); State v. Langley, 214 Or. 445, 315 P.2d 560, 323 P.2d 301, cert. denied, 358 U.S. 826, 79 S.Ct. 45, 3 L.Ed.2d 66 (1958); State v. Pearlman, 154 Or. 52, 58 P.2d 1253 (19......
- State v. Langley