State v. Lebeau
| Docket Number | 20120829 |
| Decision Date | 19 September 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
State v. Norton
... ... See LeBeau v. State , 2014 UT 39, 16, 337 P.3d 254 ("An appellate court will ... only set aside a sentence if the sentence represents an abuse of discretion, if the district court fails to consider all legally relevant factors, or if the sentence imposed is clearly excessive." (quotation simplified) ) ... ...
- Lebeau v. State
-
State v. Norton
... ... 59. He also argued that the court abused its discretion when it failed to properly conduct the interests of justice analysis required by LeBeau v. State , 2014 UT 39, 337 P.3d 254. Norton , 2018 UT App 82, 67, 427 P.3d 312. 28 Finally, Norton argued that the court of appeals should reverse his convictions under the cumulative error doctrine. Id. 87. 29 The court of appeals rejected each argument. First, the court concluded that even ... ...
-
Meza v. State
... ... We agree with the State and hold that the PCRA requires a petitioner to be both convicted and sentenced before he is entitled to relief under the act. 10 When faced with a question of statutory interpretation, our primary goal is to effectuate the intent of the Legislature. LeBeau v. State, 2014 UT 39, 20, 337 P.3d 254. The best evidence of the Legislature's intent is the statute's plain language. Id. [W]e read the plain language of the statute as a whole, and interpret its provisions in harmony with other statutes in the same chapter and related chapters. Id ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results