State v. Legg, No. 12567

• Court: Supreme Court of West Virginia
• Writing for the Court: CALHOUN
• Citation: 151 W.Va. 401,151 S.E.2d 215
• Parties: STATE of West Virginia v. Willard B. LEGG.
• Decision Date: 24 February 1967
• Docket Number: No. 12567

Page 215

151 S.E.2d 215 151 W.Va. 401 STATE of West Virginia
v.
Willard B. LEGG. No. 12567. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted Oct. 11, 1966.
Decided Nov. 22, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1967.

Page 216

Syllabus by the Court

1. The provision in Code, 1931, 58--5--4, as amended, that in criminal cases no petition for appeal or writ of error shall be presented unless a notice of intent to file such petition, fairly stating the grounds of the petition, shall have been filed with the clerk of the court in which the judgment or order was entered, within sixty days after such judgment or order was entered, is mandatory and jurisdictional.

2. In any criminal case in which a writ of error has been granted upon the petition of one who has been convicted of and sentenced for a criminal offense, the writ of error will be dismissed as having been improvidently awarded if it appears

Page 217

that he has failed to comply with the provisions of Code, 1931, 58--5--4, as amended, requiring a filing with the clerk of the trial court of a notice of intent to file such petition for a writ of error.

[151 W.Va. 402] Eugene T. Hague, Charles H. Rudolph, Jr., Parkersburg, for plaintiff in error.

C. Donald Robertson, Atty. Gen., Leo Catsonis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for defendant in error.

CALHOUN, Judge.

This case is before the Court on a writ of error to the final judgment of the Circuit Court of Wirt County. Willard B. Legg, the appellant, was convicted by the jury in a trial upon an indictment which charged him with the larceny of United States currency of the value of $64.32 of the money, goods, effects and property of the Board of Education of Wirt County.

At the time the offense is alleged to have been committed, Willard B. Legg was employed by the Board of Education of Wirt County as a teacher and as assistant principal of Wirt County High School. He was also employed by the board of education, pursuant to a 'homebound teaching' program, to teach certain high school subjects to Linda Lou Brohard at her home in Wirt County after regular school hours. Linda Lou Brohard was unable to attend high school because she was afflicted with muscular dystrophy.

The appellant was convicted on the basis of evidence introduced at the trial to prove that he received compensation in the sum of $64.32 from the board of education as a consequence of his representation that he taught Linda Lou Brohard at her home during the month of March, 1962, when, as a matter of fact, such representation was wholly false.

Code, 1931, 61--3--24, provides that if any person '* * * obtain from another, by any false pretense, token or representation, with intent to defraud, money, goods or other property which may be the subject of larceny * * * he shall * * * be deemed guilty of larceny;[151 W.Va. 403] * * * and, upon conviction, shall be confined in the penitentiary not less than one nor more than five years, * * *.' The sentence imposed upon the appellant by the Circuit Court of Wirt County on October, 7, 1965, was an indeterminate sentence of one to five years pursuant to the statute quoted above. The sentence of one to five years is a proper sentence in such circumstances, notwithstanding the fact that it is provided by Code, 1931, 61--3--13, as amended, that one convicted of grand larceny 'shall * * * be confined in the penitentiary not less than one nor more than ten years; * * *.' State v. Martin, 103 W.Va. 446, 137 S.E. 885; State v. Grove, 74 W.Va. 702, pt. 2 syl., 82 S.E. 1019.

After a writ of error was granted and after the case had been placed on the docket for argument, the State of West Virginia, by counsel, pursuant to Rule IX of the rules of this Court, filed in the office of the clerk of this Court on September 12, 1966, a motion to dismiss the 'writ of error and appeal' as having been improvidently awarded, by reason of the failure of the appellant to comply with the provisions of Code, 1931, 58--5--4, as last amended by Chapter 9, Acts of the Legislature, Regular Session, 1965. The statute in question is quoted immediately below, the second paragraph, added by the 1965 amendment, being the precise portion of the statute upon which the motion is based:

'No petition shall be presented for an appeal from, or writ of error or supersedeas to, any judgment, decree or order, whether the state be a party thereto or not, which shall have been rendered or made more than eight months before such petition is presented.

'In criminal cases no petition for appeal or writ of error shall be presented unless a notice of intent to file such petition

Page 218

shall have been filed with the clerk of the court in which the judgment or order was entered within sixty days after such judgment or order was entered. The notice shall fairly state the grounds for the petition without restricting[151 W.Va. 404] the right to assign additional grounds in the petition.'

Counsel for the appellant filed an 'answer' to the motion asserting: (1) That the provisions of the statute are not jurisdictional; and (2) that even if such provisions are jurisdictional, the appellant has substantially complied with them. Questions arising upon the motion were submitted to the Court upon written briefs and oral arguments of counsel at the same time the case was argued orally and submitted for decision upon its merits.

The appellate jurisdiction of this court in criminal cases is conferred by Article VIII, Section 3 of the Constitution of West Virginia in the following language: '* * * It shall have appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases where there has been a conviction for felony or misdemeanor in a circuit court, and where a conviction has been had in any inferior court and been affirmed in a circuit court, * * *, and such other appellate jurisdiction, in both civil and criminal cases, as may be prescribed by law.'

The Constitution does not define the procedure for appeal from a circuit court to this Court. The authority to do so has been left to the legislature. 4 C.J.S. Appeal and Error § 8, page 73. The procedure, as prescribed by the legislature, is defined in Article 5 of Chapter 58, Code, 1931, as amended. Section 1 enumerates the types of cases in which one may obtain from this Court, or from a judge thereof in vacation, an appeal from, or a writ of error or supersedeas to, a judgment, decree or order of a circuit court. Section 3 provides for the presentation of a petition, assigning errors, in this Court by a person wishing to obtain a writ of error, appeal or supersedeas in the cases enumerated in the first section. Then follows Section 4 which, as amended and reenacted in 1965, has been quoted previously in this opinion.

One convicted of a criminal offense is not entitled to a writ of error as a matter of right. The Constitution [151 W.Va. 405] and statutes create an absolute right merely...