State v. Lehman
| Docket Number | 112500 |
| Decision Date | 28 September 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
23 cases
-
State v. Schulze
...State responds parties may not stipulate to an illegal sentence and the invited error rule does not apply, citing State v. Lehman , 308 Kan. 1089, 427 P.3d 840 (2018). In Lehman , the State recommended the wrong period of postrelease supervision, and the district court sentenced Lehman base......
-
State v. Masterson
... ... State v. Jackson , 297 Kan. 110, 113, 298 P.3d 344 (2013). The parties may not agree to an illegal sentence. See State v. Lehman , 308 Kan. 1089, 1093, 427 P.3d 840 (2018). Thus, "a sentence that does not comply with required statutory procedures is an illegal sentence." Jackson , 297 Kan. at 114-15. Such a sentence may be corrected at any time. K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 22-3504(a). We have jurisdiction to consider this appeal ... ...
-
State v. Warui
... ... Whether such agreement is through an admission or a nonobjection , both are impermissible. See, e.g., Obregon , 309 Kan. at 1275 ("it is the State's burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant committed a crime for which classification is appropriate"); State v. Lehman , 308 Kan. 1089, 1093, 427 P.3d 840 (2018) (an illegal sentence may be corrected at any time); Dickey I , 301 Kan. at 1032 (explaining the difference between a defendant agreeing to the existence of convictions as opposed to agreeing to the legal effect of those convictions); State v. Weber , 297 ... ...
-
State v. Hicks
... ... State v. Dickey , 301 Kan. 1018, 1034, 350 P.3d 1054 (2015) (Dickey I ). Even if a party agrees to an incorrect criminal history score, this court may correct the resulting illegal sentence at any time. State v. Lehman , 308 Kan. 1089, 1093, 427 P.3d 840 (2018). A criminal defendant cannot stipulate to an illegal sentence. State v. Hankins , 304 Kan. 226, Syl. ¶ 3, 372 P.3d 1124 (2016). Under K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 22-3504(a), an illegal sentence may be corrected at any time while a defendant is serving that ... ...
Get Started for Free