State v. Leonard
Decision Date | 09 March 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 620P87,620P87 |
Citation | 321 N.C. 746,366 S.E.2d 867 |
Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Charles LEONARD. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Barnes, Grimes & Bunce, Lexington, for defendant.
John H. Watters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.
The Petition for Discretionary Review is:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of March 1988."
To continue reading
Request your trial13 cases
-
Steinkrause v. Tatum
... ... 728, 732-33, 515 S.E.2d 452, 455 (1999). We review whether the trial court's Findings of Fact support its conclusions of law de novo. State v. Campbell, 188 N.C.App. 701, 704, 656 S.E.2d 721, 724 (2008) ... Petitioner argues on appeal that the trial court erred by (I) ... Id.; see also State v. Leonard, 87 N.C.App. 448, 454, 361 S.E.2d 397, 400 (1987) ("The direct personal observation by the officer/affiant or his fellow officers is plainly a ... ...
-
State v. Tejeda-Rivera, No. COA08-283 (N.C. App. 10/21/2008)
... ... 693, 697, 386 S.E.2d 187, 190 (1989). "A defendant's presence on the premises and in close proximity to a controlled substance is a circumstance which may support an inference of constructive possession." State v. Alston, 91 N.C. App. 707, 710, 373 S.E.2d 306, 309 (1988) (citing State v. Leonard, 87 N.C. App. 448, 456, 361 S.E.2d 397, 402 (1987),disc. rev. denied and appeal dismissed, 321 N.C. 746, 366 S.E.2d 867(1988). See also State v. Rich, 87 N.C. App. 380, 383, 361 S.E.2d 321, 323 (1987)) ... In the case sub judice, the State presented evidence that defendant was ... ...
-
State v. Morocco
... ... See State v. Belk, 268 N.C. 320, 150 S.E.2d 481 (1966) (consent search of part of automobile beyond officer's vision reasonably included contents of paper bag between passenger's legs); see also State v. Leonard, 87 N.C.App. 448, 453, 361 S.E.2d 397, 400, appeal dismissed, rev. denied, 321 N.C. 746, 366 S.E.2d 867 (1988); LaFave & Israel, Criminal Procedure § 3.10 (1984) ... Defendant also contends that he withdrew his consent for Lowry to search the tote bag by telling him the bag ... ...
-
State v. Tate
... ... However, the State is not required to establish that a defendant owned or leased the premises on which contraband is found in order to prove control of such premises by defendant. State v. Leonard, 87 N.C.App. 448, 456, 361 S.E.2d 397, 402 (1987), disc. rev. denied, 321 N.C. 746, 366 S.E.2d 867 (1988). Where there is no evidence of ownership, defendant's exclusive control of the premises on which controlled substances are found supports an inference of defendant's constructive possession of ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results