State v. Llamas-Hernandez
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Per Curiam |
| Citation | State v. Llamas-Hernandez, 673 S.E.2d 658, 363 N.C. 8 (N.C. 2009) |
| Decision Date | 06 February 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 220A08.,220A08. |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Mario LLAMAS-HERNANDEZ. |
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
Kevin P. Tully, Public Defender, by Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for defendant-appellant.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
37 cases
-
State v. Osborne
...in [Section] 90-95 are imposed." Similarly, defendant contends that State v. Llamas-Hernandez , 189 N.C. App. 640, 652, 659 S.E.2d 79, 86 (2008) (Steelman, J., concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part), rev'd per curiam for reasons stated in dissent , 363 N.C. 8, 673 S.E.2d 658 (2009), ......
-
State v. Cooper
...extraordinarily high probative value generally assigned by jurors to expert testimony ...”State v. Llamas–Hernandez, 189 N.C.App. 640, 652–53, 659 S.E.2d 79, 86–87 (2008) (Steelman, J., dissenting), reversed per curiam for the reasons stated in the dissent,363 N.C. 8, 673 S.E.2d 658 (2009) ......
-
State Of North Carolina v. Ferguson
...818, 821-22, 370 S.E.2d 676, 677 (1988). On appeal, Defendant argues first that the Supreme Court's decision in State v. Llamas-Hernandez, 363 N.C. 8, 673 S.E.2d 658 (2009), in which it reversed the decision of this Court in State v. Llamas-Hernandez, 189 N.C.App. 640, 659 S.E.2d 79 (2008),......
-
State Of North Carolina v. Ward
...grams” at a residence where the defendant was a co-tenant. 189 N.C.App. 640, 643, 659 S.E.2d 79, 81 (2008), rev'd per curiam, 363 N.C. 8, 673 S.E.2d 658 (2009). The substance was chemically nine months before trial, but the laboratory report was not admitted into evidence as a sanction agai......
Get Started for Free
