State v. Lloyd
Decision Date | 10 August 2018 |
Docket Number | No. 115,834,115,834 |
Citation | 423 P.3d 517 |
Parties | STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Jonell K. LLOYD, Appellant. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Clayton J. Perkins, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant.
Lesley A. Isherwood, assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and Marc Bennett, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, were with her on the brief for appellee.
Jonell K. Lloyd was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder, felony murder, and abuse of an infant victim. On direct appeal, this court affirmed his conviction but remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing, with a jury impaneled to make specific factual findings supporting or not supporting an enhanced sentence. He now appeals from the newly imposed sentence.
The facts supporting the conviction were set out in State v. Lloyd , 299 Kan. 620, 325 P.3d 1122 (2014) :
, explaining this could have been caused by covering her mouth and nose; a constricting force around her neck; compression of her chest and abdomen; or an environment with limited or no oxygen. Distefano noted Chavira's asphyxiation caused brain swelling, which he said was a significant symptom because such swelling takes time to occur. He concluded the swelling indicated hours elapsed between death and the initial asphyxiationinjury to the brain. He also determined Chavira had early evolving pneumonia, which occurs when death is prolonged.
299 Kan. at 622-26, 325 P.3d 1122.
In that appeal, Lloyd raised three issues asserting trial errors: the evidence at trial was insufficient to support a premeditated murder conviction; Loudermilk's pretrial statements and trial testimony were the products of coercion and should have been suppressed; and evidence of another crime should not have been admitted. A majority of this court rejected the asserted trial errors and affirmed the conviction. In...
To continue reading
Request your trial- State v. Fleming
-
State v. Ruwart
...L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) (federal constitutional violations commonly subject to review for harmless error); State v. Lloyd, 308 Kan. 735, 740, 423 P.3d 517 (2018) (due process violation). Here, Ruwart has outlined an ostensible due process violation in the abstract without tying the error to any ......
-
State v. Ruwart
...Ct. 824, 17 L. Ed. 2d 705 (1967) (federal constitutional violations commonly subject to review for harmless error); State v. Lloyd , 308 Kan. 735, 740, 423 P.3d 517 (2018) (due process violation). Here, Ruwart has outlined an ostensible due process violation in the abstract without tying th......
- State v. Hayes