State v. Lowe
Citation | 68 N.W. 1094,66 Minn. 296 |
Parties | STATE v LOWE. |
Decision Date | 24 November 1896 |
Court | Supreme Court of Minnesota (US) |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
(Syllabus by the Court.)
1. Held, to sustain a charge of murder in the third degree, under the first part of section 6440, Gen. St. 1894, it is not necessary that more than one person was or might have been put in jeopardy by the reckless acts of the accused, but it is necessary that the act was committed without special design upon the particular person or persons with whose murder the accused is charged.
2. Held, further, the indictment in this case does not state a public offense, because it does not sufficiently charge that death was caused by any of the acts or omissions of the accused.
Appeal from district court, Ramsey county; William Louis Kelly, Judge.
Charles R. Lowe was convicted of murder in the third degree, and appeals. Reversed.
E. M. Card and C. N. Akers, for appellant.
H. W. Childs and Geo. B. Edgerton, for the State.
The appellant was convicted on the indictment hereinafter set out, and sentenced to the penitentiary. The only points urged on this appeal are: First, that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute murder in the third degree; and, second, that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute any degree of murder or manslaughter, because it does not sufficiently charge that Clara Bergh died by reason of, or as a result of, the acts or omissions of appellant.
Excluding the title and formal ending, the indictment reads as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Smith
... ... liable to be surprised at the trial and could not be expected ... to prepare for it." (State v. McFadden, 48 ... Wash. 259, 93 P. 414, 14 L. R. A., N. S., 1140; People v ... Olmstead, 30 Mich. 431; Titus v. State, 49 ... N.J.L. 36, 7 A. 621, 7 Am. Cr. Rep. 254; State v ... Lowe, 66 Minn. 296, 68 N.W. 1094; State v ... Costello, 62 Conn. 128, 25 A. 477, cited in 11 Am. Cr ... Rep. 517; Fletcher v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 300, 101 P ... 599, 23 L. R. A., N. S., 581; Ehrlick v ... Commonwealth, 125 Ky. 742, 128 Am. St. 269, 102 S.W ... 289, 10 L. R. A., N. S., 995; ... ...
-
State v. Jenner
... ... We are not persuaded that such act is punishable as second degree murder only when several potential victims are involved ... Robinson, 307 Md. at 751, 517 A.2d at 101. This is in accord with State v. Lowe, 66 Minn. 296, 68 N.W. 1094 (1896) and Hogan v. State, 36 Wis. 226 (1864), contra, Darry v. People, 10 N.Y. 120, 4 N.Y.S. 137 (1854) ... Appellant relies on State v. Reddington, 7 S.D. 368, 379, 64 N.W. 170, 174 (1895), for the proposition that "where one state adopts the statute ... ...
-
State v. Mytych, 41956
... ... 4 She cites in support of her contention State v. Lowe, 66 Minn. 296, 68 N.W. 1094 (1896); State v. Kopetka, 265 Minn. 371, 121 N.W.2d 783 (1963); and State v. Nelson, 148 Minn. 285, 181 N.W. 850 (1921) ... We find, after a careful review of defendant's contention on this issue, that those cases relied on by defendant are clearly ... ...
-
Robinson v. State
... ... People, 46 Colo. 173, 102 P. 165 (1909), 5 Massie v. State, 553 P.2d 186 (Okl.Cr.1976), and State v. Russell, 106 Utah 116, 145 P.2d 1003 (1944). On the other hand, two courts faced with a statute like the one involved in Darry have read legislative intent otherwise. In State v. Lowe, 68 N.W. 1094 (Minn.1896), the Supreme Court of Minnesota expressly disagreed with Darry. Looking to Minnesota legislative intent, the court thought it was not "necessary that more than one person was or might have been put in jeopardy by [the imminently dangerous] act." Id. at 1095. And in ... ...