State v. Lowman
Decision Date | 27 May 1926 |
Docket Number | 11999. |
Citation | State v. Lowman, 133 S.E. 457, 134 S.C. 485 (S.C. 1926) |
Parties | STATE v. LOWMAN et al. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from General Sessions Circuit Court of Aiken County; H. F Rice, Judge.
Demon Lowman, alias Son Lowman, and others were convicted of murder, and they appeal.New trial granted.
N. J Frederick, of Columbia, for appellants.
B. D Carter, Sol., of Bamberg, and R. L. Gunter and J. B. Salley both of Aiken, for the State.
PURDY A. A. J.
The following statement is taken from the case on appeal:
On account of the nature and rapidity of the concurrences at the time that Sheriff Howard came to his death, it is extremely difficult to make a satisfactory statement of the events that transpired, and, besides, an extended statement is not necessary.The sheriff, with three deputies, McElheney, Robinson, and Sheppard approached the house of Sam Lowman, having a warrant to search the house for contraband liquor, and the warrant was in the possession of Robinson.They did not know where Lowman lived, and so, seeing three boys in a field about 50 yards away from the house, they stopped and asked them if Sam Lowman lived there.These were negroes, and one of them, Demon Lowan, alias Son Lowman, was about 21 years old; Clarence Lowman, then 14 years old, and a small boy named Roy.(In addition to these three, who were members of the household of Sam Lowman, his family consisted of the woman, Annie, who was afterwards killed, the mother of Demon and Bertha, Rosa, the wife of Demon, who was about his age, Bertha, the sister of Demon, and a young girl named Birdie.)
The officers approached the house, and stopped in front of it; the sheriff and Robinson going to the right of the house, Sheppard going to the left, and McElheney going to the front door.There were some women at the back of the house.Upon seeing the officers, they ran to the house, and were intercepted at the back door by the sheriff, who told them to stand back, "and Bertha grabbed the sheriff."Annie, the mother of Demon and Bertha, attempted to assault Robinson with an axe, and, Sheppard interfering, she threatened to assault him with the axe, and he shot and killed her.
It appears that Demon Lowman entered from the front of the house, and got a pistol and fired on McElheney, and afterwards exchanged shots with Robinson in the yard.Some one shot the sheriff, and killed him at the rear of the house, and during the mêlée Bertha and Demon were wounded, and Clarence was afterwards also shot.One of the witnesses said that all of the events in the house occurred in a few seconds.
It is manifest, from the nature of the case, that, if the judgments against the defendants are to stand, there must have been a conspiracy on the part of the defendants to attack the officers.It is not the province of this court to discuss the testimony, but from the nature of the testimony it will not be amiss to say that a conspiracy could not have been formed by all of the defendants to attack the officers after the officers arrived upon the premises, and the testimony given by the witnesses does not disclose that a conspiracy existed before the visit of the officers.The concluding part of the preliminary statement in the case is:
"There was nothing immediately preceding, or in the course of the trial, to evidence any hostile or unusual feeling against the appellants."
This statement is not convincing to the court that a deep feeling against the defendants did not exist.In the first place, it would have been contrary to human nature for the people of the county not to have felt deeply incensed over the slaying of a useful officer and a highly honored citizen, and, in the next place, the able and conscientious trial judge deemed it expedient to state in his charge the reason for the appearance of the counsel appointed by the court for the defendants.The reason for this is manifest.The judge knew, or feared, that without such statement the resentment which existed in the minds of the community might react against the attorneys.Without such idea in his mind, there would have been no reason for making such statement in his charge.
His honor charged the jury, in part, as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
State v. Francis
...In their argument, counsel for appellants cite, as authority to sustain their exception to the court's ruling, the case of State v. Lowman, 134 S.C. 485, 133 S.E. 457. do not find in that case any holding of this court on a motion for continuance; in fact, the record shows affirmatively, "N......
-
State v. Campbell
... ... Campbell was that, at the time he fired at Taylor, he did not ... know that either Carlisle or Pinckney was present, and not ... until he turned from looking in the direction of Taylor did ... he see Pinckney Campbell ... In the ... case of the State against Lowman, 134 S.C. 485, 133 S.E. p ... 457, this court said: ... "It is manifest, from the nature of the case, that, if ... the judgments against the defendants are to stand, there must ... have been a conspiracy on the part of the defendants to ... attack the officers. It is not the province of this ... ...