State v. Lucarello
| Decision Date | 03 December 1975 |
| Citation | 69 N.J. 31,350 A.2d 226 |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Quincy H. LUCARELLO, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Thomas P. Ford, Jr., pro se.
R. Benjamin Cohen, Asst. Prosecutor, for plaintiff-respondent (Anthony J. Fusco, Harry Robinson, III, and Steven Rosenfeld, Asst. Prosecutors, of counsel, Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in its majority opinion reported at 135 N.J.Super. 347, 343 A.2d 465 (1975).
For affirmance: Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD--7.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
14 cases
-
Steel v. General Motors Corp.
... ... rules and constraints imposed on federal practitioners in New Jersey are the same as those imposed on New Jersey attorneys generally by the state Supreme Court under New Jersey Court Rule 1:14." Allyn Z. Lite, New Jersey Federal Practice Rules 34 (1995 ed.). See Alexander v. Primerica ... ...
-
State v. Rivera
...Co., 109 N.J. 201, 218, 536 A.2d 243 (1988); State v. Lucarello, 135 N.J.Super. 347, 353, 343 A.2d 465 (App.Div.), aff'd o.b. 69 N.J. 31, 350 A.2d 226 (1975). Licensed attorneys employed or retained by the Public Defender are subject in every respect to the rules governing the professional ......
-
Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.
...disqualified because of an ethical requirement. State v. Lucarello, 135 N.J.Super. 347, 343 A.2d 465 (App.Div.), aff'd. o.b., 69 N.J. 31, 350 A.2d 226 (1975). Further, our duty to ferret out and discourage unethical behavior is owed to the general public as well as to the parties Nothing in......
-
Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.
...No. 361, 77 N.J. 199, 390 A.2d 118 (1978); State v. Lucarello, 135 N.J.Super. 347, 343 A.2d 465 (App.Div.1975), aff'd o.b. 69 N.J. 31, 350 A.2d 226 (1975). Their exposition is so thorough as to render their further discussion redundant. The appropriateness of their application to the instan......
Request a trial to view additional results