State v. Lundstrom, 96656-7

Decision Date05 April 2019
Docket NumberNo. 96656-7,96656-7
Citation443 P.3d 800 (Table),193 Wash.2d 1007
CourtWashington Supreme Court
Parties STATE of Washington, Petitioner, v. William Edward LUNDSTROM, Respondent.
ORDER

¶ 1 This case came before the Court on its April 4, 2019, En Banc Conference to consider the petition for review. A majority of the Court voted in favor of the following result:

¶ 2 Now, therefore, it is hereby

¶ 3 ORDERED:

¶ 4 That the petition for review is denied.

 For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State v. Dillon
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 3 February 2020
    ...trial court they are discretionary LFOs. State v. Lundstrom, 6 Wash. App. 2d 388, 396 n.3, 429 P.3d 1116 (2018) rev. denied, 193 Wash.2d 1007, 443 P.3d 800 (2019).¶ 49 The record demonstrates that the trial court intended to impose only mandatory LFOs; thus, we strike the community custody ......
  • State v. Jackson
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 20 August 2019
    ...We review constitutional claims de novo. State v. Lundstrom , 6 Wash. App. 2d 388, 393, 429 P.3d 1116 (2018), review denied , 193 Wash.2d 1007, 443 P.3d 800 (2019). A criminal defendant has a right to appear before the court "with the appearance, dignity, and self-respect of a free and inno......
  • State v. Jackson
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 16 July 2020
    ...constitutional violations de novo. State v. Lundstrom , 6 Wash. App. 2d 388, 393, 429 P.3d 1116 (2018), review denied, 193 Wash.2d 1007, 443 P.3d 800 (2019) (citing State v. Gresham , 173 Wash.2d 405, 419, 269 P.3d 207 (2012) ). However, because the decision on whether to shackle a defendan......
  • State v. Starr
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 2 February 2021
    ...fees, they are discretionary LFOs. State v. Lundstrom , 6 Wash. App. 2d 388, 396 n.3, 429 P.3d 1116 (2018), review denied , 193 Wash.2d 1007, 443 P.3d 800 (2019). ¶8 But the fact that the community custody supervision fees are discretionary LFOs does also not mean that they are costs. Commu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT