State v. Lyons
Decision Date | 20 November 1923 |
Docket Number | No. 94.,94. |
Citation | 122 A. 758 |
Parties | STATE v. LYONS. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
William J. Lyons was convicted of keeping a disorderly house, and he brings error. Affirmed.
In the Supreme Court the following per curiam was filed:
On January 6, 1922, at 4:30 p. m. members of the police department and the prosecutor's office, with deputy sheriffs, raided this building and found and arrested 135 persons, including Lyons. Considerable gambling paraphernalia was seized, tables, chips, dice, horse racing slips, etc. An examination of the premises disclosed a buzzer on the first floor, back of the bar, which connected with the upper floor. In the bar, cards bearing the name of the defendant were found. The defendant was searched after his arrest and $4,700 in money found upon his person. There was also discovered back of the bar a bill for the iron work about the premises, made out to William J. Lyons, and a statement for the bill rendered, which was receipted.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Novembrino
...State v. Cortese, 104 N.J.L. 447, 139 A. 923 (E. & A. 1927), aff'g, 4 N.J. Misc. 683, 134 A. 294 (Sup.Ct.1926); State v. Lyons, 99 N.J.L. 301, 122 A. 758 (E. & A. 1923). It is also noteworthy that during the Constitutional Convention of 1947 an amendment to article I, paragraph 7 was propos......
-
Moore v. State
...36 N.H. 64, (Leading Case.) 20. NEW JERSEY. (1921). Katz v. Eldredge, 118 A. 242; (1923). State v. Gould, 122 A. 596; (Nov. 1923). State v. Lyons, 122 A. 758. 21. MEXICO. (1917). State v. Barela, 168 P. 545. 22. NEW YORK. (1922). People v. Esposito, 194 N.Y.S. 328; (1903). People v. Adams, ......
-
State v. Engel
...v. Merra, 103 N.J.L. 361, 137 A. 575 (E. & A.1927); State v. Cortese, 104 N.J.L. 447, 139 A. 923 (E. & A.1927); State v. Lyons, 99 N.J.L. 301, 122 A. 758 (E. & A.1923), "[d]uring the past twenty-five years it has consistently been applied to exclude from the State's case-in-chief evidence i......
-
State v. Macri
...without discussion of its pros and cons. See State v. MacQueen, 69 N.J.L. 522, 528, 55 A. 1006 (Sup.Ct.1903); State v. Lyons, 99 N.J.L. 301, 303, 122 A. 758 (E. & A. 1923); cf. Eleuteri v. Richman, supra, 47 N.J.Super., at pp. 9--12, 135 A.2d, at pp. 195--196; McCormick, Evidence 291 et seq......