State v. Maestas
| Docket Number | 106214 |
| Decision Date | 24 January 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
44 cases
-
Virger v. State
...v. Dressner, 255 So.3d 537, 548 (La. 2018) ; State v. Poppelriter, 50 N.E.3d 270, 276-278 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015) ; State v. Maestas, 298 Kan. 765, 316 P.3d 724, 736 (2014) ; Miller v. State, 99 So.3d 349, 390 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011) ; State v. Anderson, 789 N.W.2d 227, 237 (Minn. 2010) ; Keats......
-
State v. Blackwell
...whether a defendant is competent to stand trial and, thus, should be reviewed under the same appellate standard. See State v. Maestas , 298 Kan. 765, 316 P.3d 724 (2014) (concluding that preliminary finding that there is "reason to believe" the defendant is mentally retarded is comparable t......
-
Kahler v. Kansas
...and the possibility of commitment in lieu of incarceration, is a matter of judicial discretion, not of right. See State v. Maestas , 298 Kan. 765, 316 P.3d 724 (2014). The insane defendant is, under Kansas law, exposed to harsh criminal sanctions up to and including death. And Kansas' sente......
-
State v. Johnson
...under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Maestas , 298 Kan. 765, 780, 316 P.3d 724 (2014). But the fundamental right to a fair trial is “subject to statutory rules and caselaw interpreting the rules of evidence......
Get Started for Free