State v. Maize
| Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana |
| Writing for the Court | WINDHORST, J. |
| Citation | State v. Maize, 223 So.3d 633 (La. App. 2017) |
| Decision Date | 15 June 2017 |
| Docket Number | NO. 16–KA–575,16–KA–575 |
| Parties | STATE of Louisiana v. Jacoby A. MAIZE |
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE, STATE OF LOUISIANA, Paul D. Connick, Jr., Terry M. Boudreaux, Darren A. Allemand
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT, JACOBY A. MAIZE, Jane L. Beebe
DEFENDANT/APPELLANT, Jacoby A. Maize, In Proper Person
Panel composed of Susan M. Chehardy, Fredericka Homberg Wicker, and Stephen J. Windhorst
Defendant, Jacoby Maize, was found guilty of seven felony counts: second degree murder of Justin Hendricks, La. R.S. 14:30.1 (count one); aggravated second degree battery of Cecilia Cruz Maize, La. R.S. 14:34.7 (count two); two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, La. R.S. 14:95.1 (); intimidation of a witness, namely Cecilia Cruz Maize, La. R.S. 14:129.1 (count four); aggravated arson, La. R.S. 14:51 (count six); and aggravated assault with a firearm of Cecilia Cruz Maize, La. R.S. 37.4 (count seven).1 Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence on count one; 15 years at hard labor on count two; 20 years at hard labor without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence on count three; 40 years at hard labor on count four; 20 years at hard labor on count five; 20 years at hard labor on count six; and 10 years at hard labor on count seven. The trial court ordered that count two run consecutively to count one; count three run concurrently with count two, but consecutively to counts one, four, and five; counts four, five, and seven to run concurrently with all sentences; and count six to run consecutively to all counts. This appeal followed. For the reasons that follow, defendant's convictions are affirmed, his sentences on counts one through six are affirmed, his sentence on count seven is vacated, and the matter is remanded for resentencing on count seven and correction of the commitment.
One day in April 2011, around 4:00 A.M., Henry Linares was traveling with his friend on River Road, when he witnessed a house off of River Road on fire. They stopped, called the police and proceeded to knock on the doors of the houses in the area to alert them to the fire. The same day, in the early morning hours, Tito Guevara–Hernandez was sleeping on his mother's couch when he heard someone screaming. He went to the window and witnessed the house next door on fire.2 He woke up his mother and sister and they hid in the bathroom when he heard a knock on his front door. They stayed in the bathroom until he saw lights from an emergency vehicle. Mr. Guevara–Hernandez stated he was sitting outside on his front porch the night before the fire when he heard "arguing, fighting" coming from the house next door. He then heard "two shots and somebody ran away." He stated that he hid in the bathroom with his family because he was afraid that someone was knocking on his door the day of the fire because of what he heard on his porch the night prior to the fire.
On April 26, 2011, approximately 4:30 A.M., Detective Anthony Gaudet, an arson investigator with the Louisiana State Fire Marshal's Office, arrived at 112 Maine Street in Jefferson Parish to investigate a fire. He stated that the house was "basically, completely destroyed by the fire." The body of Justin Hendricks was found in the kitchen, with a visible gunshot wound to his pelvis area. The neighbor's home to the right was approximately fifteen to twenty feet away, and because of its close proximity, it also sustained damage from the fire that started at 112 Maine Street.
Detective Gaudet determined that the fire was not accidental or caused by a natural event, and that there was evidence indicative of human intervention in causing the fire. He also determined that there were two points of origin and that gasoline was used as an accelerant. Detective Gaudet further established that the gas meter at 112 Maine Street did not fail, nor was it a source of the fire's origin. He testified that if the fire had reached the gas meter, an explosion would have occurred which potentially could have threatened the life of any of the individuals in the house next door. Investigator Thomas Lowe, an arson investigation supervisor with the Jefferson Parish Fire Department,3 similarly determined that if the fire had reached the gas meter, the three people in the occupied residence next door "could have been seriously injured" because of a probable explosion. He concluded that the fire was intentionally set, and the fire was classified as an aggravated arson because it spread to the occupied residence next door.
Dr. Susan Garcia, a forensic pathologist with the Jefferson Parish Forensic Center, performed the autopsy of Mr. Hendricks. She testified that he sustained a single, distant-range4 gunshot wound to his left side, which severed his femoral artery. The gunshot wound was the cause of death and his death was classified as a homicide.5 She also conducted a carbon monoxide level test to determine if the fire contributed to his death. Dr. Garcia concluded that Mr. Hendricks died before he was exposed to the fire.
Dr. Garcia also testified that Mr. Hendricks had two sharp-force injuries to the ventral surface of his left forearm near his wrist.6 She determined that these two wounds were made immediately before or after he sustained the gunshot wound. She further explained that wounds on extremities are usually classified as defensive wounds. While she could not say how Mr. Hendricks received those injuries, she stated that the wounds were in a position on his body consistent with defensive wounds.7
Detective Rhonda Goff with the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, was the supervising detective in the murder investigation of Mr. Hendricks. During the investigation, she discovered a 9–1–1 call that Mr. Hendricks made on April 25, 2011, at 1:23 A.M. Mr. Hendricks advised the 9–1–1 operator that defendant, Jacoby Maize, was at his home earlier that day and defendant beat his wife, Cecilia Cruz Maize (Ms. Cruz8 ) and struck her with a gun. Defendant and Ms. Cruz, subsequently left in a black Land Rover.
On April 29, 2011, defendant and Ms. Cruz were arrested after patrol officers conducted a traffic stop on a black Land Rover. Defendant was initially arrested for an outstanding warrant with the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD) for an aggravated battery by shooting and Ms. Cruz was arrested on a probation violation.
Detective Goff interviewed Ms. Cruz after she was arrested, and Ms. Cruz appeared "beat up." She had a blood-like substance on her clothes, and an "L–type shape" wound on her forehead, "consistent with the butt of a gun striking her on the forehead." As a result of Ms. Cruz's injuries, defendant was "booked" in Jefferson Parish with a felony count of domestic battery.
Ms. Cruz characterized her relationship with defendant as "physical." Defendant beat her "everyday" and "it happened numerous times." He would beat her regardless of who was around and no one ever reported defendant to the police.9 He used his hands and objects when he beat her. She recalled a specific occasion while she and defendant were living with Amanda Glynn.10 Defendant stabbed her with a knife, resulting in a hospital visit.11 She also recalled an incident at Joan Rhode's12 home that occurred in April 2011 a few weeks before Mr. Hendricks' death, when defendant shot a gun at her. He was angry with her, but she did not remember why he was mad because she stated she did not do anything wrong. Defendant used to make her walk with her head down and she was not allowed to look at other people.
Ms. Cruz met Mr. Hendricks through defendant. In April 2011, she and defendant were living in their vehicle, a black "Range Rover," but it was impounded for lack of insurance. Mr. Hendricks helped her and defendant recover the vehicle by placing the vehicle on his insurance policy so they could retrieve their vehicle. She and defendant were at Mr. Hendricks' home on Easter Sunday, April 24, 2011. However, before they went to Mr. Hendricks' home, she and defendant picked up three of their friends, including Samer Abumusa, in New Orleans. She testified that because of her drug use, she was "asleep" for the entire ride in New Orleans.
On the morning of April 24, 2011, Mr. Abumusa was with defendant in defendant's vehicle. Defendant was driving, Ms. Cruz was in the passenger seat, and he was in the backseat with Tiffany Frey and "Freddy." Mr. Abumusa got into an argument with defendant because Ms. Cruz said "hello" to him. Defendant pulled over and parked the car, turned around and shot Mr. Abumusa. Although he got out of the vehicle and tried to get away from defendant, he was struck by three bullets before he was hit by a truck.13 Officer Angel Wilson with the NOPD responded to a call of an aggravated battery by shooting on April 24, 2011, at the intersection of Tchoupitoulas and Upperline at approximately 10:30 A.M. involving defendant and Mr. Abumusa. She recovered two casings as well as a copper bullet from the scene.14
After the shooting involving Mr. Abumusa, Ms. Cruz and defendant went to Mr. Hendricks' home on the afternoon of April 24, 2011. Ms. Cruz testified that while at Mr. Hendricks' house, they had a physical fight wherein defendant beat her with a lamp, and "with everything that he could find in that house...for, at least, 30, 35 minutes." She cried and screamed and had injuries that bled as a result of the beating. After the fight, they left Mr. Hendricks' home.
Andrea Romano, a friend of Mr. Hendricks, spoke with Mr. Hendricks twice over the phone on Easter, April 24, 2011, in the evening.15 He told her that a man and woman were in his house earlier and they fought. The man "pistol-whipped" the woman with a gun stamped with "LCPD," which he thought meant Lake Charles Police Department. He also told her that there was blood everywhere. Mr. Hendricks said...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Maize v. Louisiana
...2. State Rec., Vol. 3 of 13, Minute Entry, 3/4/16. 3. State Rec., Vol. 3 of 13, Minute Entry, 3/28/16. 4. State v. Maize, 16-KA-575 (La. App. 5th Cir. June 15, 2017), 223 So.3d 633; State Rec., Vol. 4 of 13. The appellate court referred some of the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims t......
-
State v. Littleton
...court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence pursuant to La. C.E. art 404(B)(1) will not be disturbed. State v. Maize , 16-575 (La. App. 5 Cir. 6/15/17), 223 So.3d 633, 649, writ denied, 17-1265 (La. 4/27/18), 241 So.3d 306. The probative value of the evidence must outweigh its prejudici......
-
State v. Manuel
...whether, considering the nature of the charges, the charging of several crimes would make the jury hostile. State v. Maize , 16-575 (La. App. 5 Cir. 6/15/17), 223 So.3d 633, 646, writ denied , 17-1265 (La. 4/27/18), 241 So.3d 306. Additionally, the trial court must consider whether prejudic......
-
State v. Brown
...of past crimes to prove defendant possesses bad character, and acted in conformity with that character. State v. Maize , 16-575 (La. App. 5 Cir. 6/15/17), 223 So.3d 633, 648 (citing State v. Napoleon , 12-749 (La. App. 5 Cir. 5/16/13), 119 So.3d 238, 242 ); State v. Joseph , 16-349 (La. App......