State v. Marsala
| Decision Date | 10 June 1992 |
| Citation | 223 Conn. 902,610 A.2d 177 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Michael J. MARSALA. |
Richard Emanuel, Asst. Public Defender, and G. Douglas Nash, Public Defender, in support of the petition.
Richard F. Jacobson and C. Robert Satti, Jr., Asst. State's Atty., in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn.App. 291, 605 A.2d 866, is granted, limited to the following issues:
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Diaz
...... We disagree. . We have previously held that § 54-33f did not create new substantive rights for criminal defendants but was enacted merely to set forth the appropriate procedural mechanism by which to bring a motion to suppress. State v. Marsala, 216 Conn. 150, 157, 579 A.2d 58 (1990). Section 54-33f was enacted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, reh. denied, 368 U.S. 871, 82 S.Ct. 23, 7 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961), which held that the constitutionally based ......
-
State v. Toth
...basis on which to find that probable cause existed." State v. Marsala, 27 Conn.App. 291, 296, 605 A.2d 866, cert. granted, 223 Conn. 902, 610 A.2d 177 (1992). The "totality of the circumstances" presented in the affidavits therefore supports the trial court's denial of the defendant's motio......
-
State v. Marsala, 14553
...Appellate Court's decision to pursue the second alternative, we granted the defendant's petition for certification. 1 State v. Marsala, 223 Conn. 902, 610 A.2d 177 (1992). We regret the lack of clarity in our original rescript and now direct a new trial. The judgment of the Appellate Court ......