State v. McBee
Decision Date | 25 July 1900 |
Docket Number | 654 |
Citation | 61 P. 1093,10 Kan.App. 450 |
Parties | THE STATE OF KANSAS v. MARK MCBEE |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Decided July, 1900.
Appeal from Elk district court; C. W. SHINN, judge.
Judgment of district court reversed.
CRIMINAL LAW -- Amendment of Judgment -- Additional Penalty. A journal entry of judgment in a criminal case cannot be amended after the sentence as stated in such journal entry has been fully served and the fine and costs paid, by adding thereto a penalty for failure to give the good-behavior bond provided for in the statutes.
W. A McCausland, for The State.
John Marshall, and L. Scott, for appellant.
At the October term, 1899, of the district court of Elk county, the defendant was charged in four counts with violating the prohibitory law.
The defendant McBee asked that he be permitted to plead guilty to one count, and the county attorney asked the court to accept the plea and recommended "that the sentence of the court be the minimum penalty fixed by law, provided that he save the state from all costs." It was further represented to the court that "the defendant McBee is engaged in business in said city of Howard as a druggist, and is so conducting his business as to reflect credit upon himself as an honorable gentleman, and, as I verily believe, has been so conducting said business for a long time prior to this date."
Upon this recommendation, the district court accepted the plea of guilty to the first count and the prosecuting attorney dismissed as to the remaining three.
At the time the defendant was sentenced, the trial judge entered upon his docket the following:
From this memorandum made by the court the following journal entry of the sentence and judgment of the court was drawn and recorded, and the defendant committed accordingly:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kennedy v. Reid
...papers did not refer to the additional 4 years and 1 month of probationary period, which had not expired. 13 See State v. McBee, 10 Kan.App. 450, 61 P. 1093. ...
-
Downey v. United States, 6824-6826
...District Court, 132 Iowa, 603, 109 N.W. 1085, 11 Ann.Cas. 296. "See, also, Rutland v. State, 14 Ga. App. 746, 82 S.E. 293; State v. McBee, 10 Kan.App. 450, 61 P. 1093. "We are not disposed to establish the precedent, for, in our opinion, it is better far that this appellant should escape th......
-
Richardson v. Hand
...971; In re Rex, 70 Kan. 221, 78 P. 404; State v. Meyer, 86 Kan. 793, 122 P. 101, 40 L.R.A.,N.S., 90, Ann. Cas.1913C, 278; State v. McBee, 10 Kan. App. 450, 61 P. 1093. The authorities of the petitioner have been carefully examined. They are not applicable to the facts of his case. As he con......
-
Parks v. Amrine
...971; In re Rex, 70 Kan. 221, 78 P. 404; State v. Meyer, 86 Kan. 793, 122 P. 101, 40 L.R.A.,N.S., 90, Ann.Cas.1913C, 278; State v. McBee, 10 Kan.App. 450, 61 P. 1093. our statutes and the authorities above referred to, the sentence imposed on April 5 was a valid sentence for the offense of f......