State v. Mccollum

CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtDEVIN, Justice
CitationState v. Mccollum, 6 S.E.2d 503, 210 N.C. 737 (N.C. 1940)
Decision Date03 January 1940
Docket NumberNo. 721.,721.
PartiesSTATE. v. McCOLLUM.

Appeal from Superior Court, Forsyth County; Felix E. Alley, Judge.

C. A. McCollum was convicted of manslaughter and was placed on probation for period of five years, and as special condition of probation was required to pay into the office of clerk of superior court for the use and benefit of Lola Fields, mother of the deceased, the sum of $6 per week for a period of five years. Upon death of mother of deceased, defendant petitioned to be relieved of further payments, and a counter petition was filed by Essex Fields, father of deceased. From judgment authorizing defendant to discontinue further payments, the State appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Harry McMullan, Atty. Gen., and T. W. Bruton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Winfield Blackwell, Jr., of Winston-Salem, amicus curiae.

Elledge & Wells, of Winston-Salem, for defendant.

DEVIN, Justice.

This case comes to us upon an appeal by the State from a judgment rendered by the court below upon the petition of the defendant for the construction of the judgment heretofore entered in the cause. The material facts are these. At June Term, 1938, the defendant McCollum plead guilty to the charge of manslaughter for the unlawful slaying of one Melton Fields. The judgment entered by the judge presiding at that term provided that the prayer for judgment and sentence be continued, and that defendant be placed on probation for a period of five years, under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission. It was further ordered that as a special condition of probation the defendant should "pay into the office of the Clerkof the Superior Court for the use and benefit of Lola Fields, mother of the deceased, the sum of six dollars per week for a period of five years." In March, 1939, Lola Fields died. Defendant thereupon petitioned the court that he be relieved of further payments. A counter petition was filed by Essex Fields, father of the deceased Melton Fields and husband of Lola Fields, praying that the judgment be construed to require continuance of payments by defendant for the benefit of himself or the brothers and sisters of deceased.

The court below found that the defendant had complied with all the terms of the probation order, and adjudged that the requirement for the payment of six dollars per week for the use and benefit of Lola Fields had terminated and abated on her death, and authorized defendant to discontinue further payments. The State excepted and appealed.

Under the common law no appeal lay from a judgment adverse to the sovereign, and there is no statute in North Carolina authorizing an appeal by the State under the circumstance disclosed by the record in this case. State v. Jones, 5 N.C. 257; State v. Swepson, 82 N.C. 541; State v. Savery, 126 N.C. 1083, 36 S.E. 22, 49 L.R.A. 585. The statute, C.S. § 4649, provides that an appeal to this court may be taken by the State in the following cases, and no other: (1) upon a special verdict, (2) upon a demurrer, (3) upon a motion to quash, (4) upon arrest of judgment.

In State v. Swepson, supra, it was held the State did not have right of appeal from the denial...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • State v. Kirby
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • January 6, 1970
    ... ...         'A motion in arrest of judgment is one made after verdict and to prevent entry of judgment, and is based upon the insufficiency of the indictment or some other fatal defect appearing on the face of the record.' State v. McCollum, 216 N.C. 737, 6 S.E.2d 503. In a criminal prosecution, however, judgment may be arrested when--and only when--some fatal error or defect appears on the face of the record proper. State v. Higgins, 266 N.C. 589, 146 S.E.2d 681; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59, 86 S.E.2d 774; State v. Chestnutt, 241 ... ...
  • State v. Ward
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 15, 1980
    ...N.C. 776, 32 S.E.2d 313 (1944); an adjudication that certain duties of defendant under a probation judgment had ended, State v. McCollum, 216 N.C. 737, 6 S.E.2d 503 (1940); a determination that a suspended sentence could not be revoked, State v. Cox, 13 N.C.App. 221, 185 S.E.2d 31 (1971). I......
  • State v. Doughtie
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 23, 1953
    ...233 N.W. 389. A motion in arrest of judgment is one made after verdict or a plea of guilty to prevent entry of judgment. State v. McCollum, 216 N.C. 737, 6 S.E.2d 503; 15 Am.Jur., Crim.Law, p. 101 (citing cases from other states). For the motion to be sustained it must appear that the court......
  • State v. Armstrong
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 14, 1975
    ...and is based upon the insufficiency of the indictment or some other fatal defect appearing on the face of the record. State v. McCollum, 216 N.C. 737, 6 S.E.2d 503 (1940). 'In a criminal prosecution, however, judgment may be arrested when--and only when--some fatal error or defect appears o......
  • Get Started for Free