State v. McKinley

Docket Number131226
Decision Date13 March 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
28 cases
  • Iowa Ins. Inst. v. Core Grp. of the Iowa Ass'n for Justice
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • June 12, 2015
    ...principle of statutory interpretation is that “[w]e presume statutes or rules do not contain superfluous words.” State v. McKinley, 860 N.W.2d 874, 882 (Iowa 2015) ; see also Iowa Code § 4.4(2) (setting forth the presumption that “[t]he entire statute is intended to be effective”).Iowa Code......
  • State v. Tucker
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • December 2, 2022
    ...may choose one among many acceptable alternatives, so long as its choices are not clearly untenable or unreasonable. State v. McKinley , 860 N.W.2d 874, 878 (Iowa 2015) ; see Thornberry v. State Bd. of Regents , 186 N.W.2d 154, 161 (Iowa 1971) ("[W]e have repeatedly held, ‘abuse of discreti......
  • Dempsey v. State
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • March 13, 2015
  • People v. Rainey
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • March 18, 2021
    ...representation applies equally to indigent defendants and collecting state and federal cases applying the rule); State v. McKinley , 860 N.W.2d 874, 879-80 (Iowa 2015) (adopting Harlan ’s view and collecting cases). ¶ 15 In light of this case law, we reject the People's position that if a d......
  • Get Started for Free