State v. McKoy

Citation363 N.C. 586,683 S.E.2d 215
Decision Date27 August 2009
Docket NumberNo. 241P09.,241P09.
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. William Edward McKOY.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th day of June 2009 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of August 2009."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of June 2009 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of August 2009."

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • State v. Perkins
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 6 d2 Dezembro d2 2022
    ...¶ 22 The indictments charging Defendant with rape and statutory sexual offense identify the victim with greater precision than required by McKoy or N.C. Gen. §§ 15-144.1 and -144.2, the statutes authorizing the use of short-form indictments to charge rape and statutory sexual offense, becau......
  • State v. Perkins
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 6 d2 Dezembro d2 2022
    ...... offense be alleged"). Moreover, we have previously held. that under N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 15-144.1 and -144.2,. short-form indictments charging the crimes of rape and. statutory sexual offense using the victim's initials to. identify the victim are facially valid. State v. McKoy , 196 N.C.App. 652, 657-58, 675 S.E.2d 409, 411-14,. disc. rev. denied , 363 N.C. 586, 683 S.E.2d 215. (2009). . .          ¶. 21 However, because a facially invalid indictment does not. "confer subject-matter jurisdiction on the trial. court[,]" State v. Lyons , 268 N.C.App. ......
  • State v. Perkins
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 18 d2 Outubro d2 2022
    ...... offense be alleged"). Moreover, we have previously held. that under N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 15-144.1 and -144.2,. short-form indictments charging the crimes of rape and. statutory sexual offense using the victim's initials to. identify the victim are facially valid. State v. McKoy , 196 N.C.App. 652, 657-58, 675 S.E.2d 409, 411-14,. disc. rev. denied , 363 N.C. 586, 683 S.E.2d 215. (2009). . .          ¶. 21 However, because a facially invalid indictment does not. "confer subject-matter jurisdiction on the trial. court[,]" State v. Lyons , 268 N.C.App. ......
  • State v. Perkins
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 18 d2 Outubro d2 2022
    ...¶ 22 The indictments charging Defendant with rape and statutory sexual offense identify the victim with greater precision than required by McKoy or N.C. Gen. §§ 15-144.1 and -144.2, the statutes authorizing the use of short-form indictments to charge rape and statutory sexual offense, becau......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT