State v. McNeil

Docket Number20130664
Decision Date06 January 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
67 cases
  • State v. Norton
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • May 3, 2018
    ..., 2016 UT App 157, ¶ 8, 380 P.3d 11. The prejudice standards for ineffective assistance and plain error are the same. State v. McNeil , 2016 UT 3, ¶ 29, 365 P.3d 699. Norton must demonstrate that, but for the errors, "there is a reasonable probability that ... the result of the proceeding w......
  • State v. Reigelsperger
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • June 22, 2017
    ...to show that the alleged error was prejudicial to him, and the prejudice standard is the same for both claims. See State v. McNeil , 2016 UT 3, ¶¶ 25, 29, 365 P.3d 699. Reigelsperger must establish a reasonable probability that, but for the error, " ‘the result of the proceeding would have ......
  • State v. Klenz
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • October 25, 2018
    ...of counsel, "the prejudice test is the same whether under the claim of ineffective assistance or plain error." State v. McNeil , 2016 UT 3, ¶ 29, 365 P.3d 699.13 The rule states, "A witness's credibility may be attacked or supported by testimony about the witness's reputation for having a c......
  • State v. Sanchez
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 2016
    ...of this type merely reveal people's motives for later actions.” State v. McNeil , 2013 UT App 134, ¶ 48, 302 P.3d 844, aff'd , 2016 UT 3, ¶ 46, 365 P.3d 699. Sanchez argues, and we agree, that he attempted to offer Victim's statement “simply to prove that it was made,” see Olsen , 860 P.2d ......
  • Get Started for Free