State v. Mendiola

Decision Date25 September 1975
Docket NumberNo. 3174-PR,3174-PR
Citation540 P.2d 131,112 Ariz. 165
PartiesThe STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Kay Lynn MENDIOLA, Appellant.
CourtArizona Supreme Court

Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen. by William J. Schafer, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

Ross P. Lee, Maricopa County Public Defender by Edmund T. Allen, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for appellant.

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

Petition for review granted. The opinion of the Court of Appeals as reported in 23 Ariz.App. 251, 532 P.2d 193 (1975) is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court.

STRUCKMEYER, V.C.J., and LOCKWOOD, HAYS and HOLOHAN, JJ., concur.

Note: Justice FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., did not participate in the determination of this matter and retired Justice LORNA E. LOCKWOOD sat in his stead.

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • State v. Snodgrass
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1977
    ...State v. Mendiola, 23 Ariz.App. 251, 532 P.2d 193 (1975), adopted and approved as the opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court, 112 Ariz. 165, 540 P.2d 131. However, a plea to the charge, an admission to the crime, or statements of conclusions of law do not establish a factual basis, simply bec......
  • State v. Draper
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • June 14, 1988
    ...not embodied in the written plea agreement. See also State v. Mendiola, 23 Ariz.App. 251, 253, 532 P.2d 193, 195, aff'd 112 Ariz. 165, 540 P.2d 131 (1975). Based on the record before us, it is not absolutely clear that if the trial judge had made the express inquiry as to whether there were......
  • State v. Draper
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1989
    ...end that the appropriate procedural requirements are met." State v. Mendiola, 23 Ariz. App. 251, 253, 532 P.2d 193, 195, aff'd, 112 Ariz. 165, 540 P.2d 131 (1975); see also State v. Pierce, 116 Ariz. 435, 438, 569 P.2d 865, 868 (App.1977) ("if counsel knows of any reason or circumstance tha......
  • State v. Baylis
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • August 3, 1976
    ...the trial court level in order to preserve the issue for appeal. See State v. Mendiola, 23 Ariz.App. 251, 532 P.2d 193 approved 112 Ariz. 165, 540 P.2d 131 (1975). The appellant has cited State v. Hughes, 22 Ariz.App. 19, 522 P.2d 780 (1974), where only one hearing was held and the court se......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT