State v. Miles
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | State v. Miles, 282 S.W.2d 542 (Mo. 1955) |
| Decision Date | 10 October 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 1,No. 44748,44748,1 |
| Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bob MILES and Ancel Shepard, Appellants |
Tom A. Shockley, Waynesville, for appellants.
John M. Dalton, Atty. Gen., Grover C. Huston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
HOLMAN, Commissioner.
Appellants, Bob Miles and Ancel Shepard (hereinafter called defendants), were convicted of felonious assault under the provisions of Section 559.190 (). The punishment of Miles was fixed by the jury at six months' imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $250. Shepard was assessed a fine in the same amount and imprisonment for three months.
The evidence presented on behalf of the State justifies the following statement of facts. At about one o'clock on Saturday afternoon, July 31, 1954, Jay White, the prosecuting witness, parked his car on the main street of Edgar Springs, in Phelps County, Missouri. After eating lunch he began to contact persons in the business district in the interest of his campaign for re-election to the office of prosecuting attorney of that county.
Louis Miles, the father of defendant Bob Miles, had operated a tavern in Edgar Springs prior to June 1, 1954. He apparently was unable to obtain a renewal of the license which expired on that date. It may be inferred that certain of the interested parties, including Bob Miles, were of the opinion that Jay White had been instrumental in causing the tavern to be closed. Miles, Robert Hart and two other men were seated in an automobile parked next to Jay White's car. White approached this car and began distributing campaign cards. Miles and Hart then got out of the car and Miles engaged Mr. White in a conversation about closing the tavern.
The prosecuting witness described the assault and the events immediately prior thereto as follows:
After Miles and Hart began beating White, defendant Shepard (the father-in-law of Miles) came from across the street and grabbed White around the legs. He contended at the trial that he did this in order to break up the fight, but it is perhaps significant that while he was holding him, the other two continued to beat White. Shortly after Shepard grabbed him, Mr White fell to the ground and the evidence indicates that thereafter Miles and Hart engaged in kicking him.
Witness Boyd testified that while Bob Miles was seated in the car with the other men he overheard him say,
Bob Hart (a son-in-law of Louis Miles) apparently fled after the occurrence we have described and had not been apprehended at the time of the trial. Jay White was severely injured in the affray but was able to drive back to his home in Rolla. Dr. Harry H. Davis, who examined him that afternoon, described his injuries as
In the trial of this case Jay White, the prosecuting attorney, disqualified himself because he was the prosecuting witness and the State was represented by Grover C. Huston, Assistant Attorney General, and J. Ben Searcy, Special Assistant Attorney General.
Defendant Bob Miles presented evidence to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Williams
...4). A series of cases have held submissions such as this not to be prejudicial. State v. Anglin, 222 S.W. 776 (1920) (1-4); State v. Miles, 282 S.W.2d 542 (Mo.1955) (1-3); State v. Cusumano, 372 S.W.2d 860 (Mo.1963) (2-3); State v. Stucker, 518 S.W.2d 219 (Mo.App.1974) (2); State v. Wilson,......
-
State v. Stucker, 35861
... ... Although the instruction was crudely fashioned and could not be given under our current practice following MAI-CR, a jury may base a guilty verdict upon an instruction hypothesizing several acts in the conjunctive if at least one hypothesized act is supported by evidence. Thus, in State v. Miles, 282 S.W.2d 542, 544(1, 2) (Mo.1955), the court upheld the conviction based upon an instruction hypothesizing assault with 'fists, feet, and 'with a certain blunt instrument" although there was no specific evidence to indicate the use of a blunt instrument other than the victim's testimony to the ... ...