State v. Mills
| Citation | 977 P.2d 1173,328 Or. 275 |
| Parties | State v. Richard Jack Mills NOS. A94646, S45455 |
| Decision Date | 02 February 1999 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Oregon |
Page 1173
v.
Richard Jack Mills
153 Or.App. 611, 958 P.2d 896 (petition and supplemental pro se petition)
DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Deloretto
...... State v. Pratt, 309 Or. 205, 211, 785 P.2d 350 (1990). The state has the burden of establishing relevance, id. at 210, 785 P.2d 350, and we review the trial court's determination of the first five inquiries for legal error. State v. Mills, 153 Or.App. 611, 614-15, 958 P.2d 896 (1998), rev. den., 328 Or. 275, 977 P.2d 1173 (1999). . The disputed testimony described several incidents. One of the witnesses, L, testified that defendant was her basketball coach when she was in high school in the 1980s. She described ......
-
State v. Dibala
......Johns, 301 Or. 535, 555-56, 725 P.2d 312 (1986). With respect to the first five elements—the logical relevance determination—we review for errors of law. State v. Mills, 153 Or.App. 611, 614-15, 958 P.2d 896 (1998), rev. den. 328 Or. 275 (1999). The trial court may reach the sixth element—the balancing test—only if the answer to each of the first five questions is "yes." State v. Rinkin, 141 Or.App. 355, 368, 917 P.2d 1035 (1996). If that occurs, we review the ......
- State v. Godin