State v. Moore
Citation | 969 So.2d 169 |
Decision Date | 21 July 2006 |
Docket Number | No. CR-04-0805.,CR-04-0805. |
Parties | STATE of Alabama v. Daniel Wade MOORE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Troy King, atty. gen., and Corey L. Maze, Beth Slate Poe, and Donald G. Valenska II, asst. attys. gen., for appellant.
James Timothy Kyle, Decatur; and Sherman B. Powell, Jr., Decatur, for appellee.
The State of Alabama appeals the circuit court's dismissal of the capital-murder indictment returned against Daniel Wade Moore by a Morgan County grand jury.
In November 2000, Moore was indicted for murdering Karen Croft Tipton during the course of a robbery. He was reindicted in May 2002 for five counts of capital murder for murdering Tipton during the course of committing a rape, a sexual abuse, a kidnapping, a robbery, and a burglary. Moore was convicted of four counts of capital murder. The jury recommended a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. The circuit court chose not to follow the jury's recommendation but instead sentenced Moore to death.
Moore moved for a new trial alleging that the State had violated the United States Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by failing to disclose exculpatory evidence. The circuit court granted Moore's motion and scheduled the case for retrial.
The State filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this Court attacking the circuit court's ruling granting Moore a new trial. See Rule 21(a), Ala.R.App.P. A majority of this Court requested that the respondent answer the allegations contained in the State's mandamus petition. Judge Thompson filed a response that stated, in part:
(C.R. 916-17.) We then denied the extraordinary petition. State v. Moore, 897 So.2d 1248 (Ala.Crim.App.2003) (table). A similar mandamus petition was filed in the Alabama Supreme Court. That court also denied relief. State v. Moore, (No. 1030218, November 6, 2003).
Moore then moved that the circuit court dismiss the capital-murder indictment. He alleged that he could not receive a fair retrial because of the prosecutor's many Brady violations. Fifteen months after the motion was filed the circuit court dismissed the capital-murder charges and ordered that Moore be immediately released from the Morgan County jail. The State appealed pursuant to Rule 15.7, Ala. R.Crim.P., and moved that we stay enforcement of the circuit court's order directing Moore's immediate release from custody. We granted the State's motion pursuant to Rule 15.7(d), Ala.R.Crim.P.
The State presented the following evidence at Moore's trial: On March 12, 1999, Karen Tipton's nude body was discovered in her house in Decatur. Tipton had been beaten in the head and stabbed over 20 times in her neck and chest. Various items had been taken from the house including jewelry, a video camera, and Tipton's purse.
The investigation focused on Moore after he confessed to his uncle that he had been in the Tipton house during the murder. He claimed that he was on the second floor when one of his accomplices grabbed Tipton, cut her throat, and stabbed her.
Evidence was also presented indicating that Moore had worked for the security company that had installed Tipton's security system and that he had been in the Tipton house. The State also presented evidence indicating that on the night of Tipton's murder Moore had purchased a large quantity of cocaine with cash and a new video camcorder.
Two hairs not belonging to Tipton had been discovered near Tipton's body. Forensic tests excluded 99.8% of the population as the source of the hairs. Moore was in the .2% of the population that could not be excluded.
Moore's defense was that he did not commit the murder. His entire strategy consisted of casting doubt on the State's evidence and shifting the blame to other individuals who, he said, had the means, motive, and opportunity to kill Tipton.
The State argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar the State from retrying Moore for capital murder. It further asserts that the circuit court's order dismissing the charges is erroneous because, the State argues, the court applied the incorrect legal standard and ignored Alabama precedent.
The circuit court issued a lengthy order dismissing Moore's capital-murder indictment after finding that the prosecutor's intentional misconduct barred Moore's retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause. The circuit court made the following findings of fact concerning the prosecutor's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence to Moore:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Martin
...and that a new trial would cure any prejudice that had resulted from the discovery violations. The State, citing State v. Moore, 969 So.2d 169 (Ala. Crim. App. 2006), and State v. Hall, 991 So.2d 775 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007), asserted that this Court, when given the opportunity, has never aff......
-
State v. Stafford
...as the court deems just under the circumstances" and dismissed the indictment. Although cited by the trial court, State v. Moore, 969 So. 2d 169 (Ala. Crim. App. 2006), as well as State v. Hall, 991 So. 2d 775 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007), and State v. Martin, 287 So. 3d 384 (Ala. 2018), both of ......
-
Clemons v. City of Saraland
...the circuit court remedied any prejudice she suffered in the municipal court from the City's alleged misconduct. See State v. Moore, 969 So. 2d 169 (Ala. Crim. App. 2006) (holding that any prejudice the defendant suffered from the State's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence could be re......
-
Green v. State
...the Kennedy standard and declined to extend its protections in situations such as the case at bar. For example, in State v. Moore, 969 So.2d 169 (Ala.Crim.App.2006), the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals found that a dismissal of charges against the defendant as a sanction for a Brady viola......