State v. Moran
Decision Date | 09 May 1891 |
Citation | 26 P. 754,46 Kan. 318 |
Parties | STATE v. MORAN. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
1. Where a defendant is charged with an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, under the provisions of paragraph 2159, Gen. St. 1889, and the evidence of the prosecution tends to establish that offense, and the evidence of the defendant tends to show that he shot off the deadly weapon (a pistol) into the ground with no intention to harm, hurt, or kill any one, and that no one was shot, struck, or hurt thereby, it is error for the district court to instruct the jury that they might convict the defendant of an assault with intent to commit manslaughter.
2. It is a violation of section 207 of the Criminal Code to try any person accused of felony unless he is personally present throughout the trial. State v. Myrick, 38 Kan. 238 16 P. Rep. 330.
Appeal from district court, Bourbon county; STEPHEN ALLEN, Judge pro tem.
Keene & Campbell and J. B. Larimer, for appellant.
J. N Ives, Atty. Gen., and L. C. Boyle, for the State.
Dennis Moran was in formed against by the county attorney of Bourbon county for an assault with intent to kill Alexander Mason on the 16th day of November, 1888. He was tried and convicted "of an assault with intent to commit manslaughter." He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor in the penitentiary of the state for the term of 18 months. From the sentence and judgment rendered against him he appeals to this court. The evidence of Alexander Mason, the prosecuting witness, was as follows:
The defendant, Dennis Moran, testified in his own behalf as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Neal
...State v. Meagher, 49 Mo.App. 571; See section 134, ante; Stewart v. State, 7 Cold. (Tenn.) 338; Maurer v. People, 43 N.Y. 1; State v. Moran, 46 Kan. 318, 26 P. 754; State Smith, 44 Kan. 75, 24 P. 84, 81 L. R. A. 774, 21 Am. St. Rep. 266; State v. Myrick, 38 Kan. 238, 16 P. 330. (5) The cour......
-
Frost v. State
... ... State, 60 ... Fla. 8, 52 So. 612, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 1146; Nolan v ... State, 55 Ga. 521, 21 Am. Rep. 281; Miller v ... State, 13 Ga.App. 440, 79 S.E. 232; People v ... Turney, 273 Ill. 546, 113 N.E. 105; Southerland v ... State, 176 Ind. 493, 96 N.E. 583; State v ... Moran, 46 Kan. 318, 26 P. 754; Allen v. Com., ... 86 Ky. 642, 6 S.W. 645; State v. Thomas, 128 La ... 813, 55 So. 415; Rolls v. State, 52 Miss. 391; ... People v. Sprague, 217 N.Y. 373, 111 N.E. 1077; ... State v. Dry, 152 N.C. 813, 67 S.E. 1000; Vowell ... v. State, 132 Tenn. 349, 178 S.W. 768; ... ...
-
State v. Hunt
...La. 813, 55 South. 415. It is likewise reversible error to permit any evidence to be heard in the absence of the accused. State v. Moran, 46 Kan. 318, 26 Pac. 754; Garman v. State, 66 Miss. 196, 5 South. 385; Richards v. State, 91 Tenn. 723, 20 S. W. 533, 30 Am. St. Rep. 907; Booker v. Stat......
-
State v. Rogers.
... ... In State v. Moran ... ...