State v. Morgan
| Citation | 261 Conn. 919,806 A.2d 1056 |
| Parties | STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LLOYD GEORGE MORGAN, JR. |
| Decision Date | 05 September 2002 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Connecticut |
Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 255 (AC 21008/AC 21301), is denied.
ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
20 cases
-
State v. PEDRO S.
...(Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Morgan, 70 Conn.App. 255, 287, 797 A.2d 616, cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919, 806 A.2d 1056 (2002). Having reviewed the challenged remarks, we conclude that they do not constitute prosecutorial misconduct. It was not improper fo......
-
State v. Henry
...irrelevant evidence." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Morgan, 70 Conn.App. 255, 268, 797 A.2d 616, cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919, 806 A.2d 1056 (2002). "The proffering party bears the burden of establishing the relevance of the offered testimony. Unless such a proper foundation i......
-
Moye v. Comm'r of Corr.
...trial; the court lacks discretion to deny such a request.” State v. Morgan, 70 Conn.App. 255, 277, 797 A.2d 616, cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919, 806 A.2d 1056 (2002). “[A] sequestration order merely prohibits a sequestered witness from being in the courtroom when he is not testifying.” State v......
-
State v. Orellana
...of the prosecutor's argument to discover impropriety." State v. Morgan, 70 Conn.App. 255, 290, 797 A.2d 616, cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919, 806 A.2d 1056 (2002). "We do not scrutinize each individual comment in a vacuum, but rather we must review the comments complained of in the context of t......
Request a trial to view additional results