State v. Murchison, 960019
Decision Date | 22 October 1996 |
Docket Number | No. 960019,960019 |
Citation | 562 N.W.2d 104 |
Parties | NOTICE: "SUMMARY DISPOSITION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1(a)." STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Kenneth MURCHISON, a/k/a Kenneth Murchinson, Defendant and Appellant. Crim. |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
Rick L. Volk (argued), Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kenneth Murchison, pro se. Submitted brief.
Kenneth Murchison was convicted by jury verdict of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance and was sentenced to imprisonment for 15 years. He appealed, claiming there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. The judgment of conviction is affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(3), N.D.R.App.P.
To continue reading
Request your trial2 cases
-
Murchison v. State, 20020273.
...this Court ("direct appeal"), claiming insufficiency of the evidence. We summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction in State v. Murchison, 562 N.W.2d 104 (N.D.1996). [¶ 3] While the direct appeal was pending, Murchison moved for appointment of counsel. We directed the matter to the trial......
- State v. LeBlanc, 960171