State v. Murchison, 960019

Decision Date22 October 1996
Docket NumberNo. 960019,960019
Citation562 N.W.2d 104
PartiesNOTICE: "SUMMARY DISPOSITION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1(a)." STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Kenneth MURCHISON, a/k/a Kenneth Murchinson, Defendant and Appellant. Crim.
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

Rick L. Volk (argued), Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kenneth Murchison, pro se. Submitted brief.

District Court, Burleigh County

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Murchison was convicted by jury verdict of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance and was sentenced to imprisonment for 15 years. He appealed, claiming there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. The judgment of conviction is affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(3), N.D.R.App.P.

VANDE WALLE, C.J., and MARING, NEUMANN, SANDSTROM and MESCHKE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Murchison v. State, 20020273.
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 5, 2003
    ...this Court ("direct appeal"), claiming insufficiency of the evidence. We summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction in State v. Murchison, 562 N.W.2d 104 (N.D.1996). [¶ 3] While the direct appeal was pending, Murchison moved for appointment of counsel. We directed the matter to the trial......
  • State v. LeBlanc, 960171
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1996

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT