State v. N.R.
Decision Date | 27 September 2019 |
Docket Number | No. 119,796,119,796 |
Parties | STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. N.R., Appellant. |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Rick Kittel, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, Lawrence, for appellant.
Thomas R. Stanton, deputy district attorney, Keith E. Schroeder, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.
Before Powell, P.J., Gardner, J., and Lahey, S.J.
N.R. appeals his conviction of failing to register as a sex offender. He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss, which argued that imposition of lifetime postrelease registration under the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA), K.S.A. 22-4901 et seq., is unconstitutional as applied to a 14-year-old juvenile offender. N.R. also argues that his sentence is illegal because the registration requirement was improperly imposed by a magistrate court instead of by a district court. But we find that the registration requirement is not punishment as to a juvenile and is not part of a juvenile offender's sentence, so it does not violate the constitutional provisions N.R. raises. And the relevant statutes impose on the defendant a duty to register, making any lack of a magistrate court's authority to do so immaterial. Finding no error, we affirm.
In 2006, N.R., then 14 years old, pleaded guilty to rape and was adjudicated a juvenile offender. As a result of his plea, the magistrate court granted N.R. probation with an underlying sentence of 24 months in a correctional facility. The magistrate court also ordered N.R. to register as a sex offender, without stating how long N.R. had to do so.
N.R. understood that he had to register for a period of five years from the date of adjudication. See K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 22-4906(h)(1) ( ). But in 2011, before the five-year registration period expired, the Legislature amended the statute to require lifetime registration for some juvenile offenders based on age and the severity of the offense:
"[An] offender 14 years of age or more who is adjudicated as a juvenile offender for an act which if committed by an adult would constitute a sexually violent crime set forth in subsection (c) of K.S.A. 22-4902, and amendments thereto, and such crime is an off-grid felony or a felony ranked in severity level 1 of the nondrug grid as provided in K.S.A. 21-4704, prior to its repeal, or section 285 of chapter 136 of the 2010 Session Laws of Kansas, and amendments thereto, shall be required to register for such offender's lifetime." L. 2011, ch. 95, § 6(h).
N.R. was adjudicated of committing rape, a severity level 1 offense if committed by an adult. See K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-3502(a)(2), (c). So the amended registration statute, as applied to N.R., required lifetime registration.
N.R. admits knowing that registration has always been a requirement of his release, and N.R. has registered as an offender from his adjudication until the present, except for a few instances. In 2012, N.R. was convicted of failing to register. Then in 2017, N.R. was charged with two counts of failing to register.
Before trial on those two counts, N.R. moved to dismiss, the denial of which he now appeals. He argued that the lifetime registration requirement:
The district court held a hearing on N.R.'s motion and then denied it based on its duty to follow our Supreme Court's precedent about lifetime registrations requirements.
N.R. then tried his case to the bench based on stipulated facts. Those relevant facts are:
The four exhibits referenced and incorporated in the stipulation are: (1) the original and amended juvenile offender complaints against N.R. and the related journal entries; (2) a document showing the termination of N.R.'s stay at New Beginnings; (3) a 2016 Kansas offender registration form; and (4) a 2012 journal entry of conviction for N.R.'s failure to register as a sex offender.
After considering the evidence, the district court found N.R. guilty of failing to register on both counts. It sentenced N.R. to a controlling 49 months in prison but granted a dispositional departure to community corrections for 36 months. N.R. appeals the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss, reprising the arguments he made below.
We first address N.R.'s argument that KORA's requirement of lifetime registration as a sex offender is unconstitutional as applied to juveniles. The State rejects N.R.'s as-applied constitutional arguments because the lifetime registration requirement is neither punishment nor part of N.R.'s criminal sentence.
Determining a statute's constitutionality is a question of law subject to our unlimited review. We presume statutes are constitutional and must resolve all doubts in favor of a statute's validity. State v. Petersen-Beard , 304 Kan. 192, 194, 377 P.3d 1127 (2016). We must interpret a statute in a way that makes it constitutional if any reasonable construction exists that would maintain the Legislature's apparent intent.
This court is duty bound to follow our Supreme Court precedent, absent some indication it is departing from its previous position. State v. Meyer , 51 Kan. App. 2d 1066, 1072, 360 P.3d 467 (2015). Our Supreme Court has recently found that "[t]he legislature intended KORA to be civil and nonpunitive for all classes of offenders currently subject to its provisions." State v. Huey , 306 Kan. 1005, 1009, 399 P.3d 211 (2017), cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2673, 201 L.Ed.2d 1077 (2018).
Kansas courts have repeatedly held that offender registration under KORA is not punishment. See, e.g., Petersen-Beard , 304 Kan. at 209, 377 P.3d 1127 ( ); State v. Rocheleau , 307 Kan. 761, Syl. ¶ 4, 415 P.3d 422 (2018) ; State v. Watkins , 306 Kan. 1093, 1095, 401 P.3d 607 (2017) ; Huey , 306 Kan. at 1009-10, 399 P.3d 211. Because registration is not punishment, our Supreme Court has explicitly rejected the argument that KORA's lifetime registration requirement violates an offender's constitutional rights as they relate to cruel and unusual punishment or ex post facto provisions. See State v. Reed , 306 Kan. 899, 904, 399 P.3d 865 (2017) ( ...
To continue reading
Request your trial