State v. Newman
Decision Date | 06 February 1897 |
Citation | 47 P. 881,57 Kan. 705 |
Parties | STATE v. NEWMAN. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
1. Where the defense of insanity is interposed in a prosecution for murder, the important question is the mental capacity or incapacity of the defendant at the time of the homieide: but testimony as to his state of mind shortly before and after the homicide may be received as tending to show his mental condition at the time of the homicide.
2. Where testimony is received tending to show that the defendant was mentally incapable of committing a crime, it is the duty of the court to charge the jury upon the law applicable to that defense.
3. Although the testimony may be weak as compared with other testimony tending to show sanity, the duty of weighing the same is for the determination of the jury; and in such case a refusal to submit the question to the jury, with proper instructions as to the law governing the same, is error.
Appeal from district court, Jackson county; Louis A. Myers, Judge.
Samuel F. Newman was convicted of manslaughter, and appeals. Reversed.
Samuel F. Newman was charged with the murder of Charles Hoover on the evening of October 17, 1895. At the trial he was found guilty of manslaughter in the second degree, and the punishment adjudged was imprisonment at hard labor for a term of three years. The following is a summary of the evidence as shown by the record: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Davis
... ... that where the verdict is supported by some substantial ... evidence, the verdict is conclusive. This rule has been ... adhered to in criminal actions as well as in civil ones. ( ... The State v. Potter, 16 Kan. 80; The State v ... Newman, 57 Kan. 705, 47 P. 881; 16 C. J. 760.) ... The ... judgment is ... ...
-
Fish v. Poorman
... ... A nonexpert witness may be permitted to give his judgment as ... to the sane or insane state of another's mind, after ... having detailed to the jury the extent of his opportunities ... to deduce a correct opinion and judgment thereon ... 241] condition of the ... defendant's mind for a reasonable period both before and ... after the time. (The State v. Newman, 57 Kan. 705, ... 47 P. 881.) ... "But ... in order to ascertain a person's mental condition at the ... time of the act in question, it ... ...
-
Griffin v. State, 57-18
...and this is true even though the evidence of insanity is weak and there is apparently stronger evidence to the contrary See State v. Newman, 57 Kan. 705, 47 P. 881; Stoner v. State, 100 Tex.Cr.R. 16, 271 S.W. 616; 23 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 1200 (1940); Smoot, Insanity § 504 (1929); 4 Warren,......
-
State v. Olsen
... ... the case, tend to show that the defendant was insane at the ... time of the homicide." (p. 342.) In that case the ... inquiry related to the condition of the accused four days ... after the homicide, and its rejection was held erroneous. It ... was held in The State v. Newman , 57 Kan. 705, 47 P ... 881, that where insanity is interposed as a defense testimony ... of the defendant's state of mind shortly before and after ... the homicide may be received as tending to show his mental ... condition at the time. If it is apparent in any case, [88 ... Kan. 149] from ... ...